šŸˆ New athletic related academic scandal brewing at the barn

Jan Kemp, a former English instructor whose lawsuit against the University of Georgia in the 1980s drew national attention to preferential treatment of college athletes unable to meet academic standards, died on Dec. 4 in Athens, Ga. She was 59. The cause was complications of Alzheimer’s disease, her son, Will, told The Associated Press.

While coordinator of Georgia’s remedial English program, Dr. Kemp was among several faculty members who had complained that officials at Georgia intervened in the fall of 1981 to enable nine football players to pass a remedial English course in which they had received failing grades. The athletes remained eligible to play for Georgia against Pittsburgh in the Sugar Bowl on New Year’s Day 1982.

Dr. Kemp was demoted in 1982 and dismissed the next year. She filed suit, maintaining that she had been ousted because of her complaints, a violation of her constitutional right to free speech.

In Atlanta Federal Court in January 1986, university officials defended their actions concerning the football players, saying the athletes had been admitted to the regular curriculum because they were making progress in their studies. Dr. Kemp, they said, was dismissed for disruptive conduct and for failure to conduct adequate scholarly research.

O. Hale Almand Jr., a lawyer for the defense, offered a justification for the favorable treatment accorded the athletes, citing a hypothetical player. ā€œWe may not make a university student out of him,ā€ he told the jury, ā€œbut if we can teach him to read and write, maybe he can work at the post office rather than as a garbageman when he gets through with his athletic career.ā€ LOL!

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/12/ed...kemp.html?_r=0
 
As mentioned, this (players corralled into easy majors) goes on pretty much everywhere, Bama included. What makes it funny/interesting in this case is, auburn always acts like they are above board in everything... academics, recruiting, etc. They portray themselves to be divine and golden in every aspect of their existence and anytime that narrative is challenged, they throw a fit. That is why when dirt is thrown in their direction, it's fun to just sit back for a moment and smile... because everyone hates the hypocritical holier-than-thou asshole in the group.
 
The barn fambly will have to explain their athletic administration's interference not only to SACS, but probably the NCAA as well now.

NCAA compliance expert: 'Potential NCAA issue' at Auburn after athletics tried to keep athlete-friendly major alive

Here is where the barn has serious trouble due to motive:

Auburn football's academic progress rate (APR) reached a program-low score of 935 in the 2008-09 school year, but rose in each of the next five years while more players declared themselves public administration majors.

If a team's APR score drops below the NCAA benchmark (currently a 930 four-year average) the sanctions could include loss of scholarships, reductions in practice time and potential postseason bans.
 
Last edited:
Probably not since the NCAA is pretty much a toothless tiger after the lawsuits by the former assistant Alabama coaches. They had the $30 million dollar awards reversed on appeal, but the investigative process was exposes as frauds.

Aubarn is just seen as continuing the fambly tradition of cheating at all costs to keep up with big brother.
 
Back
Top Bottom