redandwhite10
Member
Hello all. I'm a Ute fan and first-time poster. I look forward to getting to know some of you and to talk football.
I watched the SEC title game and the whole time I'm watching I'm thinking to myself "good hell, I dont want any part of either of these teams!" I have great respect for what your team did this year. With all that said, I'm glad our seniors get to play a team like Bama and I happen to know that shortly after the announcement, the players headed off to the film room. I believe it will be a great game, and not a Hawaii part 2 situation as some believe.
There are several myths I'd like to dispel about Utah.
Myth #1: Non-AQ teams are not physical
Starting with a coach named Ron McBride back in the early 90s, Utah started to recruit the polynesian islands. We started bringing in mean, 300+ lbs lineman, 250+ lbs running backs etc.. We started to get physical with the recruitment of these types of players. The polynesians are nasty on the football field, but the nicest people off of it.
Our DC during this time was Kyle Whittingham. He was a tough-nosed LB at BYU in the early 80s. His attitude, combined with the recruitment of the "Big Nasties" created an attitude in the Utah program that prevails today.
This year we have two backs averaging 230 lbs. I don't think either of them even knows what "shifty" means. Our biggest, Matt Asiata, will look for the nearest DB once he gets to the second level and head straight for him. He knows he's not out running anyone, but he may be able to run over a few in the process.
We average 308 on the OL. They aren't spectacular, but do provide good pass protection. The run game is enough to keep a balanced attack.
Injuries have decimated our DL. We are small. We are fast with good technique, but our LBs need to play out of their minds to keep us in it. We average 230 here but we are extremely quick. Our front seven gives up just over 100 ypg in the run game.
Myth #2: Non-AQ teams have less athletes
This myth is actually partially true, so maybe it isn't a myth per se. However, our 1s are as good as anyone in the country at the skill positions as a team. BCS teams separate themselves on depth. Your 2s are significantly better than ours. However, we are 99% healthy coming into this game. We lost our stud LB, but his replacement is a fighter and should do ok.
Myth #3: Non-AQ teams lack team speed
Our defense features two DBs with sub 4.3 speeds, LBs around 4.6, and one converted lineman that was clocked at 4.7. We really are fast as a team, not just a few players. I know this is old news for an SEC team, all you guys are fast, but as a non-AQ, we can compete at this level. This is one reason Utah is a cut above other non-AQ schools.
Just my two cents for now. My only hope is that our offense starts hot and forces Bama to throw the ball a bit more than they'd like. If we do that, we'll have a chance to win in the 4Q.
I watched the SEC title game and the whole time I'm watching I'm thinking to myself "good hell, I dont want any part of either of these teams!" I have great respect for what your team did this year. With all that said, I'm glad our seniors get to play a team like Bama and I happen to know that shortly after the announcement, the players headed off to the film room. I believe it will be a great game, and not a Hawaii part 2 situation as some believe.
There are several myths I'd like to dispel about Utah.
Myth #1: Non-AQ teams are not physical
Starting with a coach named Ron McBride back in the early 90s, Utah started to recruit the polynesian islands. We started bringing in mean, 300+ lbs lineman, 250+ lbs running backs etc.. We started to get physical with the recruitment of these types of players. The polynesians are nasty on the football field, but the nicest people off of it.
Our DC during this time was Kyle Whittingham. He was a tough-nosed LB at BYU in the early 80s. His attitude, combined with the recruitment of the "Big Nasties" created an attitude in the Utah program that prevails today.
This year we have two backs averaging 230 lbs. I don't think either of them even knows what "shifty" means. Our biggest, Matt Asiata, will look for the nearest DB once he gets to the second level and head straight for him. He knows he's not out running anyone, but he may be able to run over a few in the process.
We average 308 on the OL. They aren't spectacular, but do provide good pass protection. The run game is enough to keep a balanced attack.
Injuries have decimated our DL. We are small. We are fast with good technique, but our LBs need to play out of their minds to keep us in it. We average 230 here but we are extremely quick. Our front seven gives up just over 100 ypg in the run game.
Myth #2: Non-AQ teams have less athletes
This myth is actually partially true, so maybe it isn't a myth per se. However, our 1s are as good as anyone in the country at the skill positions as a team. BCS teams separate themselves on depth. Your 2s are significantly better than ours. However, we are 99% healthy coming into this game. We lost our stud LB, but his replacement is a fighter and should do ok.
Myth #3: Non-AQ teams lack team speed
Our defense features two DBs with sub 4.3 speeds, LBs around 4.6, and one converted lineman that was clocked at 4.7. We really are fast as a team, not just a few players. I know this is old news for an SEC team, all you guys are fast, but as a non-AQ, we can compete at this level. This is one reason Utah is a cut above other non-AQ schools.
Just my two cents for now. My only hope is that our offense starts hot and forces Bama to throw the ball a bit more than they'd like. If we do that, we'll have a chance to win in the 4Q.