ijijmijij said:
I'm not worried about Vanderbilt.
I was worried about Arkansas and their running game against us...now I'm admittedly even more worried about it, especially considering the swing nature of this game every year in the past.
SOMEBODY STEP UP! And Lorenzo, don't let a fine performance against Western Carolina slow you down and let you lose your focus. I think this guy is determined, he's shown that he can come back and fight it seems after what I've read about him being injured in the Spring.
Joe Kines made this comment last night.
"We were this far away (holding hands about a ft. apart) on two FG's Vann (he didn't realize until later that he was talking about Leigh, but noted, Leigh reminded him a lot of Vann) kicked from beating Arkansas."
Are we any better prepared to stop the run this year as compared to last year? I believe so, based on, more speed in our LB corps if they (Arkansas) do make it past the first line.
I realize that Jones and McFadden bring a lot to the table. I also realize, they brought that much last year, in Arkansas, and were lucky to escape that game with a W. Monk is questionable, at best, at this point in time. If he isn't through with his rehab by the 3rd week of the season we should be able to stack the box with 7-8 and leave the game to our DB's.
That being said, Arkansas doesn't bring a lot of concern to me.
Now, when it comes to Vandy, they have a better passing attack than Arkansas combined with a QB that can be as dangerous running the ball as passing it. The combination of Chris Nickson and Earl Bennett are as dangerous as many in the SEC. Add returning their TE and he'll have options; many. They lost their RG and one WR on offense. (returning 2 WR's that started last year.)
On the same note, they lost their DT and DE so we should have success with the ball control game.
Rating one game vs the next and considering the game vs Arkansas is in T-town, I'm feeling more concern about Vandy than Arkansas.