🏈 Mandel's SEC picks: Tide will do fine, but they're not winning the conference

True story: When I submitted an SEC Media Days preseason ballot with Texas A&M listed as champ, the conference office checked to make sure some imposter hadn't sent it in my place.

Apparently I was that extreme an outlier. My colleague Bruce Feldmanpicked Alabama in his SEC predictions.

So let me explain why I'm picking a team that went 3-5 in the SEC last year to rise up and surpass more conventional picks like Alabama (who I will surely be reminded beat the Aggies 59-0 last year) and Auburn (who you might need a reminder lost at home to A&M).

First of all, Kevin Sumlin is a great coach whose offense can always be counted on to be highly productive. Last year saw a dip as the Aggies struggled to replace standouts Johnny Manziel, Mike Evans and Jake Matthews. A year later, sophomore Kyle Allen has established himself at quarterback.

Defensively, A&M has been awful the past two years, but Sumlin hired one of the sport's finest coordinators in John Chavis.

And the talent is there. Freakish defensive end Myles Garrett is the most obvious standout, but plenty of others are already emerging from Sumlin's consecutive Top 7 recruiting classes of 2013 and '14.

But perhaps the most important factor is this: In an SEC West race that figures to be insanely competitive, A&M's schedule sets up more favorably than any other contender. With Arkansas a neutral-site game (in Arlington, Texas), A&M plays just three conference road games -- and one of those is Vanderbilt. It has a bye week before hosting Alabama (whereas the Tide will play physical Arkansas a week earlier) and also hosts Auburn.

So A&M is my pick to win the West. And whoever wins the West is going to win in Atlanta.

A few other thoughts:

--I'm not buying Tennessee as much as some (as you'll see, I have them losing at home to Oklahoma), but I still see the Vols winning a mediocre East. Georgia and Tennessee both play Alabama as a crossover foe, but the Dawgs also have to visit Auburn while Tennessee hosts Arkansas.

--I fear I may have Ole Miss too low, because the Rebels are loaded with top-line NFL talent and should field another elite defense. But right now I have little faith in their options at quarterback.

--LSU is the hardest team to predict. Some people may be surprised to see LSU so low, but first of all, someone has to finish sixth in the West, and while the Tigers are loaded at several positions, quarterback is not one of them.

--I see Kentucky breaking through and reaching a bowl in Mark Stoops' third season. Conversely, I foresee rough years for Steve Spurrier (whose talent level is slipping) and Jim McElwain (who inherits a horrid O-line).

1.png 2.png



Continue reading...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Super talented doesn't always translate to on the field success. hell,everyone that plays college football is super talented. Myles Garrett simply isn't living up to what the prognosticators thought. We'll see how he does this year, but basing their season on the shoulders of a guy that you see achieved last year is not the best way of going about things.
 
TAMU is in the perfect spot, I'm just not sold on their HC. They have committed to having a D (their players have already gone on record saying how easy Chavis' D is compared to their previous DC's) and they've committed to a running game.

I've been saying this for a while, but TAMU is in a really good spot, they just need to put a few things together. They've got the money/resources to outspend anyone in the country. Problem is they are catching everyone else at a similar spot or just bad timing (TCU, Baylor, ...soon to be Texas), and the rest of the SEC.

I'll never forget the Aggies faces last year after Kenny Hill went off 1st game of the season...only to watch that change over the course of the next few weeks. They went from Heisman talk to a new QB.
 
Just a casual observation here.

The content and opinions published by Mandel were always solid stuff a few years when when he was working for SI. He moved to Fox a little over a year ago and with that move has fallen sunk devolved ... he's carrying the Fox "party line" where opinions aren't meant to express thought, but to provoke reaction.

Does this type of journalism business approach work with college football fans? A very, very, very small percentage like this type of approach. Empirical evidence, like the ratings we see from Fox as compared to ESPN, demonstrate how they have alienated the vast majority.

The only valid point I see in his write-up is pointing to the schedule A&M has this fall.

I see a lot of people wonder about Tennessee under the hypothetical they may stumble out of the gate and if they do what that might mean for their season. A&M opens with Arizona State: a team that barely missed a spot in the PAC title game. What happens to that team if they stumble out of the gate? At UT, and at LSU, when's the last time you saw a Chavis defense get punched a few times and not lay down?
 
Back
Top Bottom