🏈 Keith Holcombe Commits To Bama

Splittine

Verified Member
Member
Supposedly just commuted with Bama after commenting to Miss St a few days ago. I though it was odd that a 4 star from Ttown wasn't getting any attention from Bama that I noticed. 4 Star , 6'3" 210lb Linebacker.

Anyone have any info I'm not seeing here?

null_zps85b48a42.png
 
Scout lists him as a 2-star and Rivals has him as a 3-star. He doesn't have the kind of offers we're used to seeing but I'm sure the staff sees a lot of upside in his development potential.
 
Scout lists him as a 2-star and Rivals has him as a 3-star. He doesn't have the kind of offers we're used to seeing but I'm sure the staff sees a lot of upside in his development potential.

I didn't check Scout but all others I looked at has him 3 and 4 star. Either way his video looks good, moves with great speed and kid can put a hit on someone.
 
Last edited:
Scout lists him as a 2-star and Rivals has him as a 3-star. He doesn't have the kind of offers we're used to seeing but I'm sure the staff sees a lot of upside in his development potential.

Strong camps, you can bet he'll get more attention. Good student (3.9 gpa), good frame, good athlete (fast).

Here's one of the main reasons not to pay attention—at least just after a verbal—to Scout or Rivals. Simply put, they are behind the times.

As Matt referred to Holcombe had a really strong showing at camps. And, based on that he's been re-ranked by 247Sports and ESPN. 247 upgraded him just under two weeks ago and if you look at ESPN's player rankings they have him listed as a 4* after an upgrade.

Scout has been slow for years; YEARS! Last year their rankings were adjusted after the football season concluded so you had some sites with kids ranked as a 4* player in August with Scout coming in as a 2* until they re-ranked players in December. (Their system is flawed as I see it as well. Based on their point system, you could have a long snapper ranked as a two star but considered the #1 long snapper in the country. In other words, he's not a kid that is expected to make an impact until his Jr. or Sr. year. However, that #1 ranking on a project player means he's worth (in their point system) as much as a 4* (120 points.)

Until some major changes happen the 247 Composite rankings are hands down the best judgement of talent—and still has its flaws. ESPN is a good measure for team rankings because a lot of their formula is based on filling team needs coupled with talent.
 
Scout has been slow for years; YEARS! Last year their rankings were adjusted after the football season concluded so you had some sites with kids ranked as a 4* player in August with Scout coming in as a 2* until they re-ranked players in December. (Their system is flawed as I see it as well. Based on their point system, you could have a long snapper ranked as a two star but considered the #1 long snapper in the country. In other words, he's not a kid that is expected to make an impact until his Jr. or Sr. year. However, that #1 ranking on a project player means he's worth (in their point system) as much as a 4* (120 points.)

Scout is pretty terrible, I haven't paid attention to them since the Cyrus Kouandjio stuff. After he switched from Auburn to Alabama they never even changed Bama's points or ranking, it made no sense at all. I even confronted one of their "scouts"/writers on Twitter about it and his response was pretty much "oh well."
 
Back
Top Bottom