🏈 Just for you Cowboys_4Ever

[Roll Tide Rev]

I made this for you. Enjoy! :lol:

 

[Southern Bama]

:lol:

 

[Cowboys_4Ever]

Nice! Appreciate the effort :lance:

Make sure you keep checking your official www.SECRematch.com for regular updates!!

At the end of the day, at least we all (or at least those with any common sense) can agree on the need for a major BCS overhaul/playoff system. Until then, we'll just have lots of useless debate every year about which two teams will be allowed to play. Overall, LSU is the clear number one team in the nation right now. Number 2? Not so clear. Whether you're an Alabama or an OSU fan, if you're being rational it's clear that which team should be allowed to play should not be left up to cold-calculating computers or so-called sport "experts." You're only being loyal fans when you passionately defend your school's right for a rerun, but down here in Stilly we have some pretty passionate opinions of our own on the subject. To bad we can't decide this on the field, but I guess we can all thank the BCS for that.

 

[Roll Tide Rev]

I pretty much agree with you actually. But it's the system and we are #2 for now. If OSU would have gotten the nod I promise you I would not have went to an OSU board and started threads about it.

 

[TerryP]

Nice! Appreciate the effort :lance:

Make sure you keep checking your official www.SECRematch.com for regular updates!!

At the end of the day, at least we all (or at least those with any common sense) can agree on the need for a major BCS overhaul/playoff system. Until then, we'll just have lots of useless debate every year about which two teams will be allowed to play. Overall, LSU is the clear number one team in the nation right now. Number 2? Not so clear. Whether you're an Alabama or an OSU fan, if you're being rational it's clear that which team should be allowed to play should not be left up to cold-calculating computers or so-called sport "experts." You're only being loyal fans when you passionately defend your school's right for a rerun, but down here in Stilly we have some pretty passionate opinions of our own on the subject. To bad we can't decide this on the field, but I guess we can all thank the BCS for that.

A couple of thoughts and I'll move on...

I like Cecil Hurt's comment yesterday. "If LSU played the Cowboys they'd win by two touchdowns, or more. If LSU played the Dallas Cowboys, it would be a pick 'em"

I agree with that. And, you'll not find a soul that will say "LSU will beat Alabama by two TD's or more..."

The fact is, a clear number two has been established. And, it's been on the field. Number three is clear as well and it also was settled on the field. That filed happened to be in Ames, Iowa.

 

[planomateo]

if LSU is clearly the number one school, then clearly Bama holding them to ZERO TD's and taking the to OT is worth something right?

How many TD's did you hold Iowa State too? I mean really, we lose to Vandy and we aren't even having this discussion - thats how most here would approach this...but Oklahoma State is ready to launch an investigation with T Boone. Have some freaking dignity and move on.

You lost in Ames...you can't possible justify that loss.

 

[Southern Bama]

Nice! Appreciate the effort :lance:

Make sure you keep checking your official www.SECRematch.com for regular updates!!

At the end of the day, at least we all (or at least those with any common sense) can agree on the need for a major BCS overhaul/playoff system. Until then, we'll just have lots of useless debate every year about which two teams will be allowed to play. Overall, LSU is the clear number one team in the nation right now. Number 2? Not so clear. Whether you're an Alabama or an OSU fan, if you're being rational it's clear that which team should be allowed to play should not be left up to cold-calculating computers or so-called sport "experts." You're only being loyal fans when you passionately defend your school's right for a rerun, but down here in Stilly we have some pretty passionate opinions of our own on the subject. To bad we can't decide this on the field, but I guess we can all thank the BCS for that.

I think Okie State has a nice little team, kinda fun to watch from the couch somewhere in the midwest maybe. Okie State lost to a non-ranked team.....period. As mentioned before, If Bama or LSU had lost to a similar team, nobody in the press would even give us the time of day. Okie State would be out of gas by the 3rd qtr if not sooner, if they played LSU. But hey.....weve seen this how many times ??? And let me say this one more time......YOU LOST TO AN UNRANKED TEAM...and thats why wou are #3......Frankly I think USC and Clemson could handle Okie State easily.

 

[c5vetman]

totally agree with the other Bama posters here. No one could have watched LSU vs Bama 1.0 and not come away thinking there was a more equal two teams, I mean the only real difference was the kicker, and as we all know, kickers always have their good days and bad. So, if they were so equal, and if LSU is indisputably #1, doesn't it make sense we're as close to #2 as could be? Our one loss was to the #1 team, in overtime, because of missed field goals. OkST lost to a nobody, a team barely good enough to even play in the FBS.

Edit: One more thing, we NEVER trailed during that game until it was over.

 

[Joe]

I think their should be more debate about #3. Stanford lost one game to Oregon while Okie State lost one game to Iowa St. Stanford deserves to be #3 in my opinion. Of course they will get to play for it in the Fiesta Bowl.

 

[Cowboys_4Ever]

I think their should be more debate about #3. Stanford lost one game to Oregon while Okie State lost one game to Iowa St. Stanford deserves to be #3 in my opinion. Of course they will get to play for it in the Fiesta Bowl.

So, you think a team with ZERO wins against ranked teams should be ranked third, just because their loss came against a ranked team? That's some classic SEC logic right there. Apparently it's not about who you play, but who you lose to that matters.

At least this is one argument that will be settled on the field, as it should be.

 

[Joe]

So, you think a team with ZERO wins against ranked teams should be ranked third, just because their loss came against a ranked team? That's some classic SEC logic right there. Apparently it's not about who you play, but who you lose to that matters.

At least this is one argument that will be settled on the field, as it should be.

USC is better than any team on the Okie St. schedule and they beat them. They also play defense at Stanford. A team that ranks 107th in defense does not deserve to be ahead of Stanford. IMO, I think Oregon, Wisconsin, Michigan St., Arkansas, and S. Carolina are better than OSU. A team like OSU can only thrive in a league that does not play defense.

 

[Ump]

So, you think a team with ZERO wins against ranked teams should be ranked third, just because their loss came against a ranked team? That's some classic SEC logic right there. Apparently it's not about who you play, but who you lose to that matters.

At least this is one argument that will be settled on the field, as it should be.

I just hope you are still here after Stanford kicks the snot out of the Okie St cow girls so we can poke fun at ya !!