🏈 Jim Harbaugh suspended as UM regents discussed leaving the B1G conference

RE: Stalions on the sidelines.

If he had a pass, it's about to get weird.
If he didn't have a pass, it's about to get ugly. No. Uglier.

I did find it funny the other day when Harbaugh compared his team to Nebraska: "...team is made of corn stalks." (sic)
 
100% spit balling here, but someone on the CMU staff cut a deal with Stalions (he gets sideline access to further his "research" and that coach gets some info on MSU... quid pro quo situation). McElwain likely didn't know of it, but has since put 2 + 2 together. The head coach technically approves all sideline passes and they have to meet NCAA guidelines, but I don't even think Stalions was dumb enough to use a real name. The big question for McElwain IMO, is can it be proven they already had a prior relationship... did they cross over at UM for instance? If so, his comments from last night, back him into a corner.
 
100% spit balling here, but someone on the CMU staff cut a deal with Stalions (he gets sideline access to further his "research" and that coach gets some info on MSU... quid pro quo situation). McElwain likely didn't know of it, but has since put 2 + 2 together. The head coach technically approves all sideline passes and they have to meet NCAA guidelines, but I don't even think Stalions was dumb enough to use a real name. The big question for McElwain IMO, is can it be proven they already had a prior relationship... did they cross over at UM for instance? If so, his comments from last night, back him into a corner.
Question because I'm ignorant of how the passes work. He was near the CMU bench and coaches but could he have a press pass also and be around there? Could they have made a bogus press company to front and use for field access? Just wondering if the reason they can't figure out the sideline passes is because he wasn't using one but another way to access instead.

That being said, I've been on the sideline for a WKU game when I was up there for postgrad work and didn't have a pass, smaller schools don't exactly have the security some of the SEC ones do. Even if it's supposed to be regulated by the NCAA guidelines.
 
Question because I'm ignorant of how the passes work. He was near the CMU bench and coaches but could he have a press pass also and be around there? Could they have made a bogus press company to front and use for field access? Just wondering if the reason they can't figure out the sideline passes is because he wasn't using one but another way to access instead.

That being said, I've been on the sideline for a WKU game when I was up there for postgrad work and didn't have a pass, smaller schools don't exactly have the security some of the SEC ones do. Even if it's supposed to be regulated by the NCAA guidelines.

Yeah, it would come down to whether or not he was seen by someone that would say something or not (a normal press pass wouldn't allow that type of access though in the box). Being where he was, that close to staff members though, I'd be shocked if he didn't have an actual staff pass (just without his real name maybe). He even had a coaching shirt on... maybe he bought it in the campus bookstore, but sometimes that stuff isn't available to the public.

There is the whole, if you look like you belong, and act like you belong... playbook that has been used in similar circumstances, but I just think he linked up with someone on staff and got a pass of some sort. It's the most logical path.
 


Pressure is adding up on Big Ten....



For the past two weeks, coaches across college football have been riveted by the alleged Michigan sign-stealing scheme, but inside the Big Ten, the topic has been more than just a curiosity. On Wednesday’s Big Ten coaches video call with commissioner Tony Petitti, and after Jim Harbaugh left the call, that frustration was voiced loud and clear, according to conference coaches, who said they don’t feel like the new Big Ten commissioner is “motivated” to do anything about the Wolverines.

“There is just a ton of frustration,” a Big Ten coach told The Athletic on Thursday morning. “Look at Jim Harbaugh’s record before this started. The guy was on the hot seat before 2021, and now he’s like the king of college football. … No doubt this all has had a profound effect.

“This guy’s being investigated for three different things now between the (alleged) illegal signal stealing, the (alleged) illegal recruiting during COVID and that investigation into the offensive coordinator and alleged computer hacking. There are guys (on that call) who could lose jobs, and then there’s this guy over here (Harbaugh) who is gonna get a new, bigger contract now, and they won’t do anything about him.”

Asked to describe the tone of the coaches’ sentiment expressed to Petitti, another Big Ten coach called it “angry” — particularly at the Big Ten’s lack of action, or even apparent interest in taking any.

“Everybody’s upset,” that coach told The Athletic. “Why is nothing being done? We want to know, what else do you need to know to take action? We (the Big Ten head coaches) want something done now. I don’t think people understand the advantage that what they’re (allegedly) doing gives you. People think, ‘OK, now that everybody knows, we all can just move on.’ Like, ‘now, it’s fair.’ Well, no, it isn’t. Not at all. This changes the way you operate. A lot of teams have been doing things a certain way for years. Now, it’s forcing you to teach your players a whole new way to communicate just for them. People think that this is just advanced scouting. This was damn near espionage.”

A third Big Ten head coach told The Athletic that this is “one of the most egregious breaches in the spirit of the game” he’s ever heard of.

“They (Michigan) have been manipulating the game and cheating the game for two-and-a-half years. To know exactly what the other team is doing, Michigan might as well have been playing with 15 guys on the field,” he said. “What’s the message the Big Ten is sending now by doing nothing? Win now, pay later? We might as well just send people to (scout) their practices and their games. It doesn’t encourage anybody to follow the rules. It’s just telling them to do the opposite and say, f— it.”

The NCAA is investigating Michigan’s football program amid allegations that the Wolverines used illegal in-person scouting and the recording of signals to steal signs this season. Ahead of the Michigan-Michigan State game on Oct. 21, the Big Ten approached MSU and said it was made aware of “credible evidence” regarding the sign-stealing allegations. The Big Ten said it would monitor the NCAA’s investigation into Michigan.

“The Big Ten is so much more powerful than the NCAA,” that third Big Ten coach said. “Why are you just sitting back and doing nothing about this? The Big Ten can’t pound its chest for the last 30 years about how it does the right thing ethically (when other conferences like the SEC won’t) and then have this go on. If this were a team in the bottom half of the Big Ten, would this be handled in the same way?

“When a running back gets hurt against Michigan because they knew exactly what play was coming, will that kid and his family have the ability to sue the Big Ten?”

The NCAA investigation is ongoing, a process that typically moves slowly, which makes it difficult to imagine it will reach a resolution by the time the postseason begins. The Big Ten does have the ability to act under its sportsmanship policy, but that doesn’t mean that it would want to act quickly or decisively before the NCAA completes its entire investigation and allows Michigan a chance to respond to its findings.

This is an unprecedented situation; whatever Petitti decides to do (or not do) will set a precedent. The Big Ten itself doesn’t have investigators, so it needs to rely upon the NCAA to do that part — and to determine who else was involved in the alleged scouting scheme. It’s not clear exactly what the coaches would want the league to do to punish Michigan; banning the team from competing in the Big Ten championship, for example, would harm players who had nothing to do with the sign-stealing apparatus.

A source briefed on the coaches’ call said Big Ten coaches are concerned about whether Michigan “should represent the Big Ten.”

“No matter what happens, if Michigan continues to move forward, the clouds will follow,” the source said. “They’re reading the tea leaves and wondering why the Big Ten hasn’t done anything yet. Every week and every day that goes by, people are like, ‘Something’s gotta give.’ It’s getting a little bit out of hand when you see him (allegedly) on the Central Michigan sideline. The playing field is not level right now. How can you have a team that you know has a competitive advantage over you still being allowed to play? That’s what the coaches are grappling with.”

“It feels like (former commissioner) Kevin (Warren) taking over and then COVID,” the source continued. “Tony’s walking into this situation, and people are calling for the league to make a statement before they have all the facts.”

Despite frustration from all corners of the conference, sources at four different Big Ten schools said they do not expect the conference to levy any sort of punishment against Michigan before the season ends.

Earlier this week, Central Michigan said it is investigating whether suspended Michigan staffer Connor Stalions was on the CMU sideline during the Chippewas’ Sept. 1 game at Michigan State. Screenshots of a person who looks similar to Stalions began circulating online Monday night, and The Athletic obtained more photos of the person on the sideline Tuesday.



Stalions, who was suspended with pay by Michigan on Oct. 20, is at the center of the NCAA’s investigation into the alleged scouting and sign-stealing scheme. Stalions bought tickets to games in at least seven Big Ten stadiums before those teams played the Wolverines over the past three seasons, including the 2023 season, sources told The Athletic last month. Purchasing the tickets is not a violation of NCAA rules, but using them to scout and record other teams would violate the rules, prohibiting in-person, on-campus scouting and the audio or video recording of signals.

On Monday, coach Jim Harbaugh met with reporters and said “the people that know us the most think the most of us” as Michigan faces the NCAA investigation. He has denied knowledge of the alleged scouting.
 
It's a weird dynamic playing out... The other teams in the conference are pissed and want retribution, now. The conference itself, is unlikely to do anything right now... 1) because Michigan is trending to the playoffs. 2) along those same lines, pressure from Fox. But their neighbors don't care about all that, they feel like they've been screwed by Michigan so they are putting pressure on the NCAA to do something. They’ve pissed a lot of folks off by doing this. And the opponents may end up doing more damage to them than the NCAA will, at least as long as Harbaugh is there.

Also, I guess we can go ahead and add this scandal to the long list of Transgressions of the Morally Superior Big 10.

Something to keep an eye on, the other schools were not at all satisfied with the (lack of) response from the conference, so they are taking their issues from private to public at this point to bring more pressure to bear.

Example:

 
Curious as to whether there could be some UM victories vacated down the road. I would not be surprised.

ROLL TIDE! MTAQ!
Logic says yes. And, if nothing happens this season, UM is fined covering what they were awarded in the post-season plus a little more: a show cause or two passed down.

We've talked over the years about teams being punished where the players on those punished teams had nothing to do with the sanctions. This is a situation where the B1G needs to step in, quickly. Or, we'll see the same thing happen again.

This team, and this staff, need to be sanctioned. They are directly benefiting.
 
Back
Top Bottom