šŸˆ In my view, Tommy Rees is on the same level as Lane, and Sark. Maybe a step higher.

Iā€™m not putting him on Sarkā€™s level until I see annihilation in a NC game. Maybe Iā€™m remembering wrong, but he kept the D on their heels for entire games. WR weā€™re running wide open. We had 4 3-and-outs last night and another 3 and field goal. Some of it is Milroeā€™s accuracy and some him taking huge sacks. But not on those 5 possessions. Weā€™ve improved greatly, obviously, and maybe he gets there in another year. But Sark is is rare air for me.
I agree. Sark is another level on offense.
 
Sark: motion creates opportunities.
Lane: Big play capability.
Rees: Adaption. He's calling schemes to create opportunities, and we've still got the big plays.

I'm weighing these thoughts against my crimson colored glasses...

Folks, I believe we've seen some of the best coaching we've seen in years. Take a minute...and...

Process.
How he has developed Milroe is perhaps the QB coaching we have ever seen at Bamaā€¦
 
don't forget that part of the struggles in the 2nd half was Kirby adapting and better play calling on their side... he's still a great defensive mind and ability to adapt at halftime is what makes Georgia so good, just like us.
 
I think Milroe is and always was a beast in waiting. Simpson will be good too. When you see all of the QBs struggling, there is more to it than just the QB. The O-Line is the measuring point, they got better. Milroe is a stud, period, his abilities are Heisman mention type. It takes the O-line a lot of GOOD snaps and feel for each other to gel than people realize. So, as the O-line got better everything around it got better. JMHO.
FIFY....you welcome.
 


Write your reply...
Back
Top Bottom