šŸˆ I'm tired of the SEC scheduling FCS opponents...especially in November

Got ya.... we have no input to sec schedules....just take what we get...
Not you daddys Bama... AD must be asleep at the wheel

Not asleep. Just the only SEC AD whose input will not be accepted by the SEC. If Bama is for it, the SEC is against it. Been that way ever since Coach Bryant offered to sponsor GT's readmittance to the SEC. He would not have received a seconding motion.
 
Not asleep. Just the only SEC AD whose input will not be accepted by the SEC. If Bama is for it, the SEC is against it.
Hopefully thats not true.......But with former Commish Kramer in there I would have believed......
Anyway
..my piece is said....i have been a stockholder ( season ticket holder..Tide pride) for a long time... seen a lot of citadels, ga states, western here and there.....
"If the powers want it so....so it shall be"...,
 
Point on @planomateo ....there are always solutions....paying an AD mill plus...
Hc 10mill plus... between 2 solution can be enacted if desired....
If not just say so...." .we are scheduling such and such for money" ...
Transparency....i can accept such

If Saban and UA have been in support of a nine conference game schedule for years now how do you see either of them, or both of them, getting the SEC to change their scheduling?

You mention transparency when they've said "these were the options and they were limited. " That's being transparent, is it not? Then, after the fact, the teams available are listed here and it supports what they saying...but that's met with it being called "bullshit?"

Matt is right here. The only way this gets changed is in the SEC offices and considering how well it's worked for the conference what motive or reason would they have to change the current system? To be fair across the board it would also mean conferences like the ACC need to stop scheduling these opponents.
 
Hopefully thats not true.......But with former Commish Kramer in there I would have believed......
Wait. What? You really think Kramer would have done something that originates and is supported by UA? If so, you don't know ol' Roy. It's documented he didn't treat Alabama like he treated the other SEC schools.
 
If Saban and UA have been in support of a nine conference game schedule for years now how do you see either of them, or both of them, getting the SEC to change their scheduling?

You mention transparency when they've said "these were the options and they were limited. " That's being transparent, is it not? Then, after the fact, the teams available are listed here and it supports what they saying...but that's met with it being called "bullshit?"

Matt is right here. The only way this gets changed is in the SEC offices and considering how well it's worked for the conference what motive or reason would they have to change the current system? To be fair across the board it would also mean conferences like the ACC need to stop scheduling these opponents.
Geeze...Terry....yea i know nick was for 9....this is about the othe 3-4.... and if we got 9....it wouldbe the bottom of the sec east...( vandy, ky, mizzu on most years wouldnt be much of an upgrade)...already play TN...and everything below that is weak.. .invcludng #3 tn..but thats not the point...
The point is...the AD says..we upgrading schedules... maybe we r doing that...see howmany of these get cancelled..
Its bullshit when we cant do better than the westerns and first and second year programs...period
 
Regretfully it's hard to get 14 teams on the same page, especially if it's going to make schedules harder. Hell, they don't want 9 conference games.

Need someone with a vision in the SEC office vs just doing the same old shit.
 
Back
Top Bottom