I said this in another thread, but I'll expound on it here since the topic has its own home now. IMO, Byrne is saying this stuff, and saying it very publically, to help generate change in the system. It's basically a threat (for now), or a warning, however you want to categorize it. But it's a leverage play. The last thing he wants to do is start canceling these contracts with other bigger name OOC schools. First of all, he'd be pissing off many of his own season ticket holders, and that is a relationship that has already had its ups and downs to say the least. A major complaint we heard from ticket holders (including some here on this site) was that they wanted better home games... too many cupcakes wasn't worth the money (and in some cases travel) they were spending. Well, adding a cupcake back into the mix at this point isn't likely to sit well with that group. Also, from a revenue standpoint, while it could be managed to a degree in terms of adding extra home games, the premium ticket prices for the high level OOC games would vanish. Face value on an upper deck ticket for Georgia and auburn this year was $200. It'll be the same next year with Tennessee and LSU. For Western Kentucky and Mercer? $25. From a money standpoint, Bama needs those upcoming FSU, Ohio State, and Notre Dame home games to keep the coffers fed. Lastly, the TV partners will shit a brick if Alabama (and other SEC/B1G schools) start dumping these premium OOC matchups. They've forked over a lot of money for the rights to these games, billions specifically. And that last point, is where change gets made. I can guarantee you the TV partners (Disney and Warner Bros in this case) are not thrilled with the matchups in this 12 team playoff. It's their money that is feeding the system. The SEC, B1G, and TV execs will come together and and rework this (no later than next year) so that all 3 benefit from it. That's why I said when the SMU's and Boise's better enjoy their piece of cake while they have a piece.