🏈 🔥 Hot Seat 2025 / Coaching Carousel:

Justneedme81 said:
Doesn't matter who was the boss, etc.

She played a role in all of this. She was a home wrecker... She knew he was married. At any point during their consensual relationship, she could've said no. She has to bear the same consequences as he is facing because they both made a huge mess.
Click to expand...
He was stalking her, sending a ton of texts and phone calls which led to her going to school leadership then he busted into her house, threatened her, and threatened to off himself, that by definition is a victim. The moral aspect doesn’t eliminate the victim aspect
 
ElephantStomp said:
He was stalking her, sending a ton of texts and phone calls which led to her going to school leadership then he busted into her house, threatened her, and threatened to off himself, that by definition is a victim. The moral aspect doesn’t eliminate the victim aspect
Click to expand...
That story was a lie.

She told a lie to 911! dispatcher that he had been stalking her when they were together all the way up to last Monday.

That's why he went to her house after getting fired because she had decided that Monday (last Monday )to reveal it all .. even when she told the Michigan officials this summer that they were not having affairs and never had affairs.

That was a scorned angry woman who was pissed at him and decided to get revenge. I'm telling you, wait and let it play out and you'll eventually will realize she wasn't a victim. She knew what she was doing. I've seen this story many times ...

Watch two things will happen and bookmark this post.

Moore will sue university and will reach settlement.

Moore will sue the woman and it will get messy.
 
Justneedme81 said:
How does it not work? Do you not see what you're saying.

Moore cheated on wife with a female.

A female sleeps with a married man knowing he's married.

You can't just cherry pick a narrative like that.
Click to expand...
Both were morally wrong, but Moore went WAY OVERBOARD when he broke into her place. No winners on either side in this one and the truest victims are his kids and wife, well soon to be ex-wife.
 
Justneedme81 said:
How does it not work? Do you not see what you're saying.

Moore cheated on wife with a female.

A female sleeps with a married man knowing he's married.

You can't just cherry pick a narrative like that.
Click to expand...
Sex doesn't matter. Do you not understand sleeping with a subordinate and the policies against it and why they are in place? It's pretty standard in most every place of business. Definitely not a cherry picked narrative, more policies and facts.
 
Justneedme81 said:
That story was a lie.

She told a lie to 911! dispatcher that he had been stalking her when they were together all the way up to last Monday.

That's why he went to her house after getting fired because she had decided that Monday (last Monday )to reveal it all .. even when she told the Michigan officials this summer that they were not having affairs and never had affairs.

That was a scorned angry woman who was pissed at him and decided to get revenge. I'm telling you, wait and let it play out and you'll eventually will realize she wasn't a victim. She knew what she was doing. I've seen this story many times ...

Watch two things will happen and bookmark this post.

Moore will sue university and will reach settlement.

Moore will sue the woman and it will get messy.
Click to expand...
If none of it were true he really is a dumbass because all he had to do was remain calm and prove his innocence.
 
Justneedme81 said:
That story was a lie.

She told a lie to 911! dispatcher that he had been stalking her when they were together all the way up to last Monday.

That's why he went to her house after getting fired because she had decided that Monday (last Monday )to reveal it all .. even when she told the Michigan officials this summer that they were not having affairs and never had affairs.

That was a scorned angry woman who was pissed at him and decided to get revenge. I'm telling you, wait and let it play out and you'll eventually will realize she wasn't a victim. She knew what she was doing. I've seen this story many times ...

Watch two things will happen and bookmark this post.

Moore will sue university and will reach settlement.

Moore will sue the woman and it will get messy.
Click to expand...
Moore just might know where Jim Harbaugh and other Go Blue officials buried the bodies from these past 4-6 years

Then again, the NCAA will just add more years to Pruitt's show cause.
 
JoseyWalesTheOutlaw said:
Moore just might know where Jim Harbaugh and other Go Blue officials buried the bodies from these past 4-6 years

Then again, the NCAA will just add more years to Pruitt's show cause.
Click to expand...
One of the best lines ever, Jerry Tarkanian, UNLV basketball coach, “the NCAA got so mad at Kentucky, they gave Cleveland State another year of probation”.
 
Justneedme81 said:
That story was a lie.

She told a lie to 911! dispatcher that he had been stalking her when they were together all the way up to last Monday.

That's why he went to her house after getting fired because she had decided that Monday (last Monday )to reveal it all .. even when she told the Michigan officials this summer that they were not having affairs and never had affairs.

That was a scorned angry woman who was pissed at him and decided to get revenge. I'm telling you, wait and let it play out and you'll eventually will realize she wasn't a victim. She knew what she was doing. I've seen this story many times ...

Watch two things will happen and bookmark this post.

Moore will sue university and will reach settlement.

Moore will sue the woman and it will get messy.
Click to expand...
Yes, you’re right. The woman in this case is the issue and the poor dude was picked on because he’s a male, no other reason, just the poor man getting picked on.

She did say they weren’t in a relationship then she ended things Monday and he flipped his noodle. As for your “that story was a lie”- well since the cops saw the texts and phone calls, don’t think that was a lie. She decided Monday to end the relationship and she revealed it all because he flipped his noodle because he’s like a lot of people, can’t accept the fact that a woman didn’t want to be with him anymore.

Two things are going to happen, he’s going to accept a plea agreement, he’ll attempt to sue the school and he’ll lose. You do realize there has to be some level of proof to arrest and charge right?
 
ElephantStomp said:
Two things are going to happen, he’s going to accept a plea agreement, he’ll attempt to sue the school and he’ll lose. You do realize there has to be some level of proof to arrest and charge right?
Click to expand...
I wouldn't bet on an L.

I haven't looked at UM's practices to see if this is true. While reporting on this story several have mentioned he didn't have a representative from HR present. If that is stipulated in their bylaws? Lawsuit awaits. And, it's one I believe UM would settle as quickly as possible to keep this story, and subsequent stories about UM football, out of the headlines.

If it's true there was a mental illness prior to his breakdown and they knew about it all along? Lawsuit awaits. See above.

I think we need to remember that the people at UM and the system itself (judicial in civil and criminal) move to a different beat in Michigan. And we're adding football to the equation?

Seriously. If there ever is a never say never...it's right now.
 

The University of Michigan is not firing the woman involved in the "inappropriate" relationship with Sherrone Moore.

Moore, the program's football coach, was fired for having an "inappropriate" relationship with a female staff member. He was later arrested on criminal trespassing and stalking charges, after learning of his firing. Michigan said in a statement last Wednesday night, December 10, that Moore was being fired immediately.

“When the findings of a university investigation into Coach Moore’s behavior were presented on Wednesday, we immediately terminated his employment,” Grasso wrote in a letter to the university," the school's president said.

“There is absolutely no tolerance for this conduct at the University of Michigan. None.”

But while Moore was fired for having the "inappropriate" relationship with the staff member, the woman - who also hid the relationship from the school for months, if not longer - is not being fired.

The University of Michigan announced that the woman is still employed by the university.

Why?

The school's policy does not apply to her. It only applied to Moore, since he was the person in power, according to USA TODAY.

“Recognizing that Intimate Relationships exist or may develop in the workplace that are not initiated by a Supervisor and are free from coercion and abuse of power, immediate disclosure of the relationship by the Supervisor is required,” the policy states. “Failure of the Supervisor to disclose an Intimate Relationship is a serious offense and cause for discipline, up to and including dismissal from employment.”

The woman was technically encouraged to share news of the relationship with the school, though she wasn't required to do so.

“Although encouraged, Supervisees have no obligation to disclose,” the policy states.

Why is that the school's policy?​

The school recognizes that the person in the relationship who has more power at the school has the opportunity to abuse said power. The person without it has less.

“Intimate Relationships initiated by a Supervisor are at high risk of being unwelcomed and experienced by the Supervisee as harassment,” the policy states. “Supervisors are therefore responsible for understanding how their statements and conduct may reasonably be interpreted by persons who do not share their same level of power.”

The school clearly outlines its rules in Policy No. 201.97.

It states that a supervisor may not “implicitly or explicitly, initiate or attempt to initiate an intimate relationship with a supervisee.”

So it was Moore, who has been married for 10 years with three children, that was the one at fault.
 
BAMANEWSBOT said:

The University of Michigan is not firing the woman involved in the "inappropriate" relationship with Sherrone Moore.

Moore, the program's football coach, was fired for having an "inappropriate" relationship with a female staff member. He was later arrested on criminal trespassing and stalking charges, after learning of his firing. Michigan said in a statement last Wednesday night, December 10, that Moore was being fired immediately.

“When the findings of a university investigation into Coach Moore’s behavior were presented on Wednesday, we immediately terminated his employment,” Grasso wrote in a letter to the university," the school's president said.

“There is absolutely no tolerance for this conduct at the University of Michigan. None.”

But while Moore was fired for having the "inappropriate" relationship with the staff member, the woman - who also hid the relationship from the school for months, if not longer - is not being fired.

The University of Michigan announced that the woman is still employed by the university.

Why?

The school's policy does not apply to her. It only applied to Moore, since he was the person in power, according to USA TODAY.

“Recognizing that Intimate Relationships exist or may develop in the workplace that are not initiated by a Supervisor and are free from coercion and abuse of power, immediate disclosure of the relationship by the Supervisor is required,” the policy states. “Failure of the Supervisor to disclose an Intimate Relationship is a serious offense and cause for discipline, up to and including dismissal from employment.”

The woman was technically encouraged to share news of the relationship with the school, though she wasn't required to do so.

“Although encouraged, Supervisees have no obligation to disclose,” the policy states.

Why is that the school's policy?​

The school recognizes that the person in the relationship who has more power at the school has the opportunity to abuse said power. The person without it has less.

“Intimate Relationships initiated by a Supervisor are at high risk of being unwelcomed and experienced by the Supervisee as harassment,” the policy states. “Supervisors are therefore responsible for understanding how their statements and conduct may reasonably be interpreted by persons who do not share their same level of power.”

The school clearly outlines its rules in Policy No. 201.97.

It states that a supervisor may not “implicitly or explicitly, initiate or attempt to initiate an intimate relationship with a supervisee.”

So it was Moore, who has been married for 10 years with three children, that was the one at fault.
Click to expand...
Ooooh, now that's where things get musky ...
 

Similar threads

S
📡 Hot Seat: CBS Sports ranks SEC Football head coaches' seats from hottest to coolest - On3.com
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
footballer
F
S
📡 2025 SEC football preview: Power Rankings, top players, must-see games - ESPN
    • Like
Replies
1
Views
1K
TerryP
TerryP
Brandon Van de Graaff
⚾ 🥎 ⚾ Bama Baseball 2025 Roster and Season Preview
    • Roll Tide!
    • Like
2
Replies
21
Views
2K
Justneedme81
Justneedme81
S
🏈 Why SEC reversed course on AQ-heavy College Football Playoff format and what it means for Big Ten relationship - CBS Sports
Replies
2
Views
2K
50+yeartidefan
50+yeartidefan
S
📡 The SEC, NCAA and a Fight to Change College Sports - SI
Replies
0
Views
1K
SEC Sports
S
Back
Top Bottom