Urban had a new addendum added to his contract, that he clearly violated. He knew of, or reasonably should've known of the domestic violence taking place. He then lied about it, days after Smith was fired (and Smith was fired 15 minutes after McMurphy broke the story about the 2015 incident, which Meyer said was "made up").
It's the use of Title IX that bothers me. The fact he lied about it is another part of the whole story.
I don't see it being legal to release Meyer under the Title IX umbrella if she isn't under the "Ohio State community." Title IX is about protection from ... it's not a prosecutor tool. She is a victim, but not one of Ohio State's compliance with Title IX.
I'm not sure what your implications are, other than disagreeing with the magnitude of this transgression in that you don't believe it should be compared to Penn St. OK, that's kind of missing the larger point.
The Penn State reference wasn't mine. It was one thrown out--almost as if it was a talking point--when they were discussing the societal impact (yes, *
that's* what we watch ESPN for.)
I agree, and disagree with the comparison. It's true in the sense it's a black eye for Meyer and Ohio State today. I disagree with trying to compare it to Penn State in any shape or form. Except one.
The NCAA had no business in the Penn State affair.
I'm having a hard time seeing how this is linked with Title IX (IF I'm supposed to take Title IX for what it is intended--equal treatment for people within a University's community.)