BamaFan334
Member
Now Watson and his team is saying there was consensual acts taking place. Throws the whole Texans conspiracy out the window. Clemson fans are now crushed.
Right thing to say....Now Watson and his team is saying there was consensual acts taking place. Throws the whole Texans conspiracy out the window. Clemson fans are now crushed.
So, he was paying to get a hand job.Now Watson and his team is saying there was consensual acts taking place.
Absolutely. Just wants a moment with no commitments or effortsYou still have to wonder why does he need to go to a massage parlor for “activity?” Not a bad looking dude, lots of money, educated (assuming he retained something from his degree) and employed.
One thing he needs to remember is that the appearance of impropriety is often worse than actual impropriety. If you do something wrong, you can make amends for it if you are willing. But if others think you did wrong and you didn't, or if you don't see your actions as wong while others do, there is little you can do.
one thing you can do.....is not worry about what others think...
If you let others control what you think....you got problems
appearance of impropriety is often worse than actual impropriety.
So, he was paying to get a hand job.
So, he was paying to get a hand job.
How do you do that....get somebody to do something ...like sex-like thing....f they dont want to do it....Tons of folks would consider that perfectly fine if both parties agree to it. The real problem is the appearance that he was trying to get people who did not agree to do it anyway.
I'm in that group. Here's the catch.Tons of folks would consider that perfectly fine if both parties agree to it.
Big difference though..from sexual assault....I'm in that group. Here's the catch.
Based on what's being said there have been consensual "get togethers." In very plain English that says to me he paid these ladies to jerk him off and they agreed. That's a paid sexual experience. That's also against the law, right?
So if I'm reading this correctly their defense is based on an acknowledgment he was paying for a sexual experience. Am I reading this wrong?