Then practically every extension we see for a newer coach is stupid in spite of the reasons why it's done. As example, it's stupid to send that message to recruits? That's one of the primary reasons for such extensions.
On the other hand we could have seen UA give him an extension with a buyout below what the market was dictating. And, then we're left with a recruiting trail littered with "UA isn't supporting their head coach."
One thing that strikes me as one of those "unsaid's..."
If Avery should have skipped to the NBA he'd be looking at paying UA over three million according to that buyout clause. I'm betting no one would consider that stupid if this story would have gone along those paths.
The biggest issue being missed here is "market driven." Call the market stupid if you must. A school or administration staying within that market is one of the definitions of being competitive, is it not?