planomateo said:hopefully this year will cause other conferences to get behind getting rid of BCS and getting a real playoff schedule done.
what a year...LSwho lost twice as #1 and still makes it to the big show.
planomateo said:my understanding is the Rose Bowl is always Pac-10 vs Big-10 champs unless involved in national championship game. Illinois is #2 in big-10, so they get the nod.
CrimsonPirate said:Since our conference champ is in the Big Game, wouldn't our conference runner-up (UT) be the host for the Sugar Bowl. Am I missing something?
planomateo said:CrimsonPirate said:Since our conference champ is in the Big Game, wouldn't our conference runner-up (UT) be the host for the Sugar Bowl. Am I missing something?
who cares, it's UTanytime phil gets the short end of the stick, it's a good thing.
actually, i think this came down to standings, but not certain.
TerryP said:I assume that is a serious question?planomateo said:terryp, what is the mandate?
Official law/rule.
RollTideRandy said:No I think he means that the second best bowl bid MUST go to the loser of the SEC Championship Game. Thatās the mandate. Not what is a mandate.
planomateo said:TerryP said:I assume that is a serious question?planomateo said:terryp, what is the mandate?
Official law/rule.
yeah, meaning, what exactly did the SEC manadate.i'm asking because I think the Sugar is better than the Outback.