The regular season SEC championship is much more meaningful than the SEC Tournament championship. And we have more than enough data points in recent years to show that the late season stress that the SECT puts on champions, isn't worth the price when they get bounced early from the Dance because they don't have their legs back. And yes, 10-15 years ago, it would have been great for Bama to win it. Usually because they had to win it because they were a perennial bubble team (which I alluded to in the previous reply). I have zero issues admitting that and am glad and thankful that Oats has the program at this level now where it doesn't matter.
I'll also add, and I know some don't want to believe this, but again, data points (and their own words)... the Committee basically ignores league tournament results other than the obvious bid guarantees that the winners get. So, from Bama's perspective... meaningless (or way overrated if one prefers that word).