šŸˆ Anyone seen this?

Read it somewhere this morning.
My thoughts were
........him or his crew.....
Reviewed.....review crew suspended also....
...he wasnt line judge....who called fumble before it crossed goal...

Long term official....they all miss calls....

As far as TO or clapping.... wasn't him either...

Soundslike bullshit....but to appease AU....who knows
 
SEC needs to get some younger officials that are in shape. All conferences for that matter.

Just for fun… If I were CFB commissioner, the officiating would be overhauled like this…

Keep in mind, some of this stuff is already in place, they just don't do a very good job with it.

There is a hiring of a Power 4 group of officials, enough to cover all the necessary games. So no more conference specific groups.

They will be full time officials and will work on 1 year contracts and receive benefits and year round training, but are also subjected to game-by-game and season-by-season reviews which can impact their standing. Officials must pass fairly extensive physicals and occasional examinations on the rules and regulations, not just overall rules, but also tailored to their duties (which position(s) they can be assigned to cover). Head referees must be able to test out on all of the material.

Officials are rated on their game performances by the head coaches from the games they call, with a standardized report card and feedback system. That system is optional, but those who don't partake may lose out on getting the higher rated crews for their games in certain instances. Any major discrepancies in the grades are reviewed by a 3rd party "retired" official who is basically a grade arbitrator.

The officiating crews with the highest grades are assigned to the higher profile games each week. If they keep doing a good job and getting graded well, they will keep doing those games. If their grades drop, the quality of the games they call will drop as well. Over time, after an initial couple of seasons of fluctuation in the "rankings", the overall rankings would likely begin to settle into a more firm pattern much like we see the same football teams in the top 20 year after year.

Each official would be deeply vetted on their backgrounds. Nobody on a crew who went to [insert school here] or has ever been associated with [insert school here] in a number of listed ways, can call that team's games. But, there is an option for crews to swap/trade out officials for a game weekend if it's agreed to by both head referees and the overall commissioner of officiating. Example: Crew A has a back judge who put 3 kids through school at Ohio State, but they are a good crew and were selected for an OSU v. Michigan game. They can swap their back judge out with another crew for that game. Only official that cannot be swapped out is the head referee.

At the end of the season, bonus money is awarded by tier to the best crews. Top 20% or whatever. Also, every crew and official is reviewed and either resigned to another contract or let go based on overall performance.

The bottom 30% of crews have to partake in extra/extended off season training.

An incentive program is started and funded by the Power 4 to try and cultivate a younger generation into the business. Nationwide training programs, similar to umpire schools in baseball, where applications are accepted and those approved are given free training to help them start (or continue) their careers at the lower levels of football like the high school level or Div III.
 
Just for fun… If I were CFB commissioner, the officiating would be overhauled like this…

Keep in mind, some of this stuff is already in place, they just don't do a very good job with it.

There is a hiring of a Power 4 group of officials, enough to cover all the necessary games. So no more conference specific groups.

They will be full time officials and will work on 1 year contracts and receive benefits and year round training, but are also subjected to game-by-game and season-by-season reviews which can impact their standing. Officials must pass fairly extensive physicals and occasional examinations on the rules and regulations, not just overall rules, but also tailored to their duties (which position(s) they can be assigned to cover). Head referees must be able to test out on all of the material.

Officials are rated on their game performances by the head coaches from the games they call, with a standardized report card and feedback system. That system is optional, but those who don't partake may lose out on getting the higher rated crews for their games in certain instances. Any major discrepancies in the grades are reviewed by a 3rd party "retired" official who is basically a grade arbitrator.

The officiating crews with the highest grades are assigned to the higher profile games each week. If they keep doing a good job and getting graded well, they will keep doing those games. If their grades drop, the quality of the games they call will drop as well. Over time, after an initial couple of seasons of fluctuation in the "rankings", the overall rankings would likely begin to settle into a more firm pattern much like we see the same football teams in the top 20 year after year.

Each official would be deeply vetted on their backgrounds. Nobody on a crew who went to [insert school here] or has ever been associated with [insert school here] in a number of listed ways, can call that team's games. But, there is an option for crews to swap/trade out officials for a game weekend if it's agreed to by both head referees and the overall commissioner of officiating. Example: Crew A has a back judge who put 3 kids through school at Ohio State, but they are a good crew and were selected for an OSU v. Michigan game. They can swap their back judge out with another crew for that game. Only official that cannot be swapped out is the head referee.

At the end of the season, bonus money is awarded by tier to the best crews. Top 20% or whatever. Also, every crew and official is reviewed and either resigned to another contract or let go based on overall performance.

The bottom 30% of crews have to partake in extra/extended off season training.

An incentive program is started and funded by the Power 4 to try and cultivate a younger generation into the business. Nationwide training programs, similar to umpire schools in baseball, where applications are accepted and those approved are given free training to help them start (or continue) their careers at the lower levels of football like the high school level or Div III.
You looking for a job?????
 
It seems that ā€œfiredā€ would flow better that ā€œpermanently suspendedā€.
@Brandon Van de Graaff didn’t the SEC release a statement following the blown call in the Barn/OU game? Doesn’t it seem reasonable that they would do so again, IF it were true?
Also, you would think the replay officials would be called out as well and they wouldn’t wait 2 weeks either.

I’m talking about from a personnel standpoint. They’ve dumped officials before but I don’t think they comment on it. They’ve been asked about this specific report from numerous outlets and reporters and told them they aren’t commenting.

But yes, in cases like you’re talking about, they will release statements.
 
ESPN says they have confirmed that he’s suspended the remainder of the season. So does that give these early reporters some credibility?

That’s basically what I was told when I asked someone earlier today with UA. That it wasn’t necessarily a lifetime suspension or even firing, but that he was suspended indefinitely. That was their understanding of it anyway. But he couldn’t 100% confirm. That’s why I tried to give YH News a some credence earlier.
 
That’s basically what I was told when I asked someone earlier today with UA. That it wasn’t necessarily a lifetime suspension or even firing, but that he was suspended indefinitely. That was their understanding of it anyway. But he couldn’t 100% confirm. That’s why I tried to give YH News a some credence earlier.
There's still meat on the bone; gotta be. I haven't asked anyone about this and haven't spent any time reading about the story. It ranks right up there with the ballroom at the WH stories.
 
There's still meat on the bone; gotta be. I haven't asked anyone about this and haven't spent any time reading about the story. It ranks right up there with the ballroom at the WH stories.

I don't really have anything against YHN, but I didn't read it either... the gist of the article was summarized in their original tweet. I was skeptical at first, since no other outlets had followed up... but with the way the SEC stays buttoned up on that stuff, it seems nobody talked right away (on the record). Now it appears to be verified by numerous people. I'm a little torn on how it was handled, but most of that stems from auburn always playing the victim card.
 
Back
Top Bottom