🏈 Alabama safety Mark Barron arrested on misdemeanor charge

not trying to be argumenative here.. i just want to understand..

i was under the impression that everything said between you and a cop CAN be used against you in a court of law.. and if this is the case then someone could possibly incriminate themselves by not keeping quiet..

i am also not seeing where barron lied to the cop.. he did not give the identity of the driver, but he did not give a false identity either... for all the cop knew maybe barron refered to his cousin as "bull"..

maybe i can help since im actually a LEO myself. whenever we question a suspect about any crime that they may have committed or question them in general about any crime that has been committed then that information that they provide can be used in court against them or any person involved with the crime in question. In order for it to be admissable in court, the suspect must have been read their miranda rights. we all know what that is. If they were not read miranda anything they said will not be allowed as it falls under the fruit of the poisonus tree doctrine. Now with that being said, EVERY court system is different and alot depends on lawyers as if being read miranda would even be brought into question to begin with. The article stated that the LEO determined that it was his cousin driving. who knows what questions were asked but im sure that the LEO just didnt make up a name that just happened to be the cousin of mark barron..... know what i mean?? if mark wasnt ever mirandized then he will probably beat the case seeing how you cant provide false answers to a line of questioning that is inadmissable in court. but as previously mentioned, every court system is different.
 
Back
Top Bottom