šŸ“” Alabama players react to late Texas A&M timeouts that drew boos

  • Thread starter Thread starter Michael Casagrande | mcasagrande@al.com
  • Start date Start date
M

Michael Casagrande | mcasagrande@al.com

Texas A&M called two timeouts in the final 13 seconds.

It's fair to say those remaining in Bryant-Denny Stadium didn't appreciate the closing seconds of Saturday's game.

They wanted a clean celebration of Alabama's 45-23 win over Texas A&M. The Aggies were more interested in making it 45-30.

With the game long-since decided, Texas A&M called a timeout with 13 seconds left and another with three ticks on the clock. It drew a healthy round of boos from the Crimson Tide faithful not interested in any further drama.

A few Alabama players reacted to the situation after the game.

"I have no clue on the reason why they did that, said Alabama starting defensive lineman Isaiah Buggs. "But like I said, you still play. We're going to play until the whistle blows."

And they did.

Reserve defensive linemen stuck Aggie quarterback Nick Starkel just as he threw the ball after reaching the Tide 18. The game ended and Alabama defenders celebrated like that hit decided the game.

"I was thinking they are trying to score on us," Alabama cornerback Trevon Diggs said. "So, we told the defense we have to lock up. We have to play good sound defense because they're trying to score on us."

Buggs loved it too.

"Here," he said, "everybody eats. Everybody plays so when a guy comes in and makes a big play like that, everybody celebrates. It's about family here. That's what happens."

If anything, it's the perfect example coaches can use for playing a full game in the game. A&M didn't worry about the scoreboard and Alabama wanted to make that same point.

"We always play 60 minutes," said outside linebacker Anfernee Jennings. "The game was still going and we wanted to finish strong, the way we're supposed to. So, by Johnny Dwight getting that tackle, that gave us momentum."

Diggs made the point that good teams don't give up when they fall behind by a wide margin in the third quarter. It sounded like he respected Texas A&M's resolve but didn't want anything to do with a late touchdown.

"Yeah, I felt like, we ain't letting them score on us so I felt like it was a plus for us," Diggs said. "Even letting them get down there was bad. We shouldn't have let them get down there and get the momentum going and even have the opportunity to score."

Alabama players react to late Texas A&M timeouts that drew boos
 
i get that jimbo wanted his guys to fight until the end and that they were trying to score; but he's gotta know that it will just piss our guys off and most times it will end the way it did....with mond getting his ass planted on the turf.
 
Truth is Bama's defense needs the work against pretty good offensive teams. Allowing the QB to run for a 100 yards shows a weakness that has to be addressed. The good news there is nobody on our schedule that has a more agile QB than the Collies even though the barn QB made some very important yards last year.
 
Truth is Bama's defense needs the work against pretty good offensive teams. Allowing the QB to run for a 100 yards shows a weakness that has to be addressed.
Let's be fair here. In the first half he had runs for 54 and 34 yards--a total of 112 on the day. In the second half he was accounted for and contained.

If we're going to point to the defense in the first half we also have to point to A&M's offensive scheme in the same half. They were holding an extra blocker back with those runs and unless a defense is going to keep a guy in the box--which Bama did successfully in the second half--they're going to get their yards.

Much like Bama's opponents are finding themselves in a "pick your poison" role this fall, Bama found itself there yesterday. They weren't allowing what Mond had been successful doing--long completions. (It wasn't a guard against YAC, it was about eliminating as many of those completions as possible.)

It's not pretty on the box score, but it's not something I've overly concerned with either. To me, it was just another in-game adjustment due to a pretty good offensive game plan.
 
Truth is Bama's defense needs the work against pretty good offensive teams. Allowing the QB to run for a 100 yards shows a weakness that has to be addressed.
Let's be fair here. In the first half he had runs for 54 and 34 yards--a total of 112 on the day. In the second half he was accounted for and contained.

If we're going to point to the defense in the first half we also have to point to A&M's offensive scheme in the same half.

and unless a defense is going to keep a guy in the box--which Bama did successfully in the second half--they're going to get their yards.

Much like Bama's opponents are finding themselves in a "pick your poison" role this fall, Bama found itself there yesterday. They weren't allowing what Mond had been successful doing--long completions. (It wasn't a guard against YAC, it was about eliminating as many of those completions as possible.)

It's not pretty on the box score, but it's not something I've overly concerned with either. To me, it was just another in-game adjustment due to a pretty good offensive game plan.

They were holding ........let me stop you right there....they dayum sure were holding play after play yet no calls..
 
They were holding ........let me stop you right there...
There's no reason to "stop me." I never go there. I never have. Complaining about calls/no-calls is one of my biggest gripes about fans of college football (and I'm very much aware of the disparity in numbers we've seen on penalties these last several years.).

This isn't any different than complaints about the running game when we're looking at seven in the box with five or six guys blocking. It's an advantage for the defense each time. Here having that extra blocker back was an advantage for A&M in the first half--until Bama kept a guy in for what basically was a spy role.

How many yards did Mond have in the second half? If we're going to answer this question the same way stats are officially compiled his rushing totals were a negative number in the second half.
 
While I didn't like it, I understood why Jimbo was calling the TOs. The old coach in me saw it, the guy sweating his ass off in the stands didn't like it though.
I thought Tosh made a good adjustment at the half to offset a very good plan that Jimbo had put together. We shutdown the QB runs in the 2nd half and like @TerryP said, it was a "pick your poison" thing in the 1st half.
 
Back
Top Bottom