šŸˆ 252, is the ATL Sports Council behind the attempt to get the GT vs UGA game in the Dome?

TerryP

Successfully wasting your time since...
Staff
...I'm hearing there are talks about moving the 2011 game into the dome...that would be the next year GT has a home game scheduled.
 
...I'm hearing there are talks about moving the 2011 game into the dome...that would be the next year GT has a home game scheduled.

Sorry I was away from the computer this afternoon with the Grandson. I heard the reports on 680 TheFan while I was out. I knew Stokan was talking with them, but I didn't think they were anywhere near a point that anything would be made public. I don't know why Evans made his comments unless he was running up a flag to see which way the wind was blowing.
 
Sorry I was away from the computer this afternoon with the Grandson. I heard the reports on 680 TheFan while I was out. I knew Stokan was talking with them, but I didn't think they were anywhere near a point that anything would be made public. I don't know why Evans made his comments unless he was running up a flag to see which way the wind was blowing.

Next question: What are the thoughts on the tickets? Same set up as if it was played at Grant Field...or more to UGA than normal?
 
Shake the tree...see if you can get anything to fall. I'd love to hear about it.


I can't imagine any varriance from the 50-50 ticket split, which would not go over very well with the Tech fan base. And if you click on the UGA blog in this thread, you will see by looking at the poll and the comments that the UGA fan base is heavilly against it. Of course that would probably change if they learned they were going to get half of the tickets. I just don't see the game happening.
 
I can't imagine any varriance from the 50-50 ticket split, which would not go over very well with the Tech fan base. And if you click on the UGA blog in this thread, you will see by looking at the poll and the comments that the UGA fan base is heavilly against it. Of course that would probably change if they learned they were going to get half of the tickets. I just don't see the game happening.

That's what has my interest peaked. It would essentially replace a GT home game. And, if I was GT, no matter the payout I wouldn't sacrifice the ticket split.

Well, then again, if the payout was that good?
 
That's what has my interest peaked. It would essentially replace a GT home game. And, if I was GT, no matter the payout I wouldn't sacrifice the ticket split.

Well, then again, if the payout was that good?

The payout is not good enough to offend half of your season ticket holders and students by taking their ticket(s) and giving them to your/their most bitter rival.
 
Look at it this way, even at only getting 50% of the tickets, the Dome is so much bigger than GT's little field, the GT people would still get about the same # of tickets. We're talking what, 75,000 seats compared to 45,000 seats? GT doesn't sell out anyway at home, so there really isn't much of deal breaker as far as ticket split goes for GT fans, I wouldn't imagine. Maybe perceived instead of actual.
 
Look at it this way, even at only getting 50% of the tickets, the Dome is so much bigger than GT's little field, the GT people would still get about the same # of tickets. We're talking what, 75,000 seats compared to 45,000 seats? GT doesn't sell out anyway at home, so there really isn't much of deal breaker as far as ticket split goes for GT fans, I wouldn't imagine. Maybe perceived instead of actual.

It is a big deal. You're giving your biggest rival the opportunity to have just as many of their fans there as yours, and it's YOUR home game. If I was a Techie I'd be furious if this was approved with split tixs.
 
It is a big deal. You're giving your biggest rival the opportunity to have just as many of their fans there as yours, and it's YOUR home game. If I was a Techie I'd be furious if this was approved with split tixs.

I agree it would be a big deal anywhere else, but Tech can't even sell out those measley 45,000 seats when there's no competition from opposing schools like GA, I'd bet that dawg fans probably buy up as many as half of the tix when they play at GT's stadium anyway. I just hate Tech because I work with so many GT engineers - almost none of them ever go to any games, unless some other GT is giving them away.
 
I agree it would be a big deal anywhere else, but Tech can't even sell out those measley 45,000 seats when there's no competition from opposing schools like GA, I'd bet that dawg fans probably buy up as many as half of the tix when they play at GT's stadium anyway. I just hate Tech because I work with so many GT engineers - almost none of them ever go to any games, unless some other GT is giving them away.

I have been to one GT/UGA game at Grant Field and it's definitely a home-field advantage to the Jackets and the game I went to was a sell out.
 
Actually we are all looking at the forest here and can't see it for the trees. If they were to jump in and have a neutral site game in 2011, since they play every year, all it would do is change the year in which each is the home team. It would be similar to what Bama and LSU did in 1992 http://football.stassen.com/cgi-bin...&end=1993&team1=Alabama&team2=Louisiana+State and what Bama and MSU did in 2002 http://football.stassen.com/cgi-bin...nd=2003&team1=Alabama&team2=Mississippi+State. The reason I show 3 years is because in the final 2 years they each played home and away. What difference did it make in which year? None! My point is, after a neutral site game in 2011, UGA and GT would begin a new home and away series. In 2012 and 2013, each would have a home game. Makes no difference where or in which year.

By the way, my brother still contends that LSU owes Bama a home game because of the 1992 switch. He has never said a word about the MSU switch. :smile::lol::rofl:
 
Last edited:
Actually we are all looking at the forest here and can't see it for the trees. If they were to jump in and have a neutral site game in 2011, since they play every year, all it would do is change the year in which each is the home team. It would be similar to what Bama and LSU did in 1992 http://football.stassen.com/cgi-bin...&end=1993&team1=Alabama&team2=Louisiana+State and what Bama and MSU did in 2002 http://football.stassen.com/cgi-bin...nd=2003&team1=Alabama&team2=Mississippi+State. The reason I show 3 years is because in the final 2 years they each played home and away. What difference did it make in which year? None! My point is, after a neutral site game in 2011, UGA and GT would begin a new home and away series. In 2012 and 2013, each would have a home game. Makes no difference where or in which year.

By the way, my brother still contends that LSU owes Bama a home game because of the 1992 switch. He has never said a word about the MSU switch. :smile::lol::rofl:

This was my point
 
Back
Top Bottom