As an old baseball coach, I would say that it was legal because he maintains contact with the pitching rubber through the entire motion. I don't think he could keep it up through an entire at bat without falling down on his ass. Screwy as hell and he would likely get knocked off the mound the first time.
As an old baseball coach, I would say that it was legal because he maintains contact with the pitching rubber through the entire motion. I don't think he could keep it up through an entire at bat without falling down on his ass. Screwy as hell and he would likely get knocked off the mound the first time.
I was hoping a baseball coach or umpire would comment....
For one who played a lot of baseball growing up ( and pitched).....i didnt have a clue....lol
I was hoping a baseball coach or umpire would comment....
For one who played a lot of baseball growing up ( and pitched).....i didnt have a clue....lol
Let me add to this. It is much like the separation of the throwing hand from the glove in the stretch, like patting it. If he only does it once, then it is a balk, but if it is in his motion every single throw, it is allowed. This would make me question the legality of this motion as well. Just a little more food for thought.
What I meant is, if he were to walk out onto the mound and starting warming up in the traditional sense but then first batter comes out and throws a pitch from this wind up/delivery. Opposing coach would immediately jump on it should the ump not call it. Now if in his warm up tosses, all 10 are from this wind up, game on. It would then be considered his normal wind up much like a closer that always throws from the stretch.
It kinda does....not enough that it would be called..... i think...
always taught and never did have foot left rubber... but have seen
some pitchers that lift up some...but not called.... i am going with coach @UAgrad93 on this...
When his plant foot goes from 180 degrees back to the 360 degree start point it definitely looses
Contact . Might not be called but technically , it’s a balk .
When his plant foot goes from 180 degrees back to the 360 degree start point it definitely looses
Contact . Might not be called but technically , it’s a balk .
Wouldn't be called a balk, but rather no pitch called. Only a balk with runners on. If he did this with runners on then he and his coach are both dumbasses.
As a former umpire: it’s not a balk because he never loses contact with the rubber and always continues towards the plate with no stops, so it’s perfextly legal but quirky. It seems rather slow so I doubt it would be good with bases loaded a fast runner could steal home
When his plant foot goes from 180 degrees back to the 360 degree start point it definitely looses
Contact . Might not be called but technically , it’s a balk .
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.