🏈 Week 11: Other Games Thread

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Source with knowledge of situation tells me Marcus Mariota has a partial sprain of his MCL <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23GoDucks&amp;src=hash">#GoDucks</a></p>&mdash; Collin Harmon (@Collin_Harmon) <a href="https://twitter.com/Collin_Harmon/statuses/398621949783322625">November 8, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Source with knowledge of situation tells me Marcus Mariota has a partial sprain of his MCL <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23GoDucks&amp;src=hash">#GoDucks</a></p>&mdash; Collin Harmon (@Collin_Harmon) <a href="https://twitter.com/Collin_Harmon/statuses/398621949783322625">November 8, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The plot thickens ..
 
Targeting penalty and ejection .. Oklahoma's Shepherd still down after a big hit, not helmet to helmet, that stripped the ball. 8 trainers looking at him. 2 penalties on Baylor on the play (targeting and unnecessary roughness).

Shepherd still down after 3 minutes, golf cart coming ..

EDIT: ejection taken back after review. Interesting. It was shoulder to shoulder . And Shepherd is up!

Maybe it's because I'm still not used to these new rules against targeting, but I thought that was about as clean of a hit as it could have been. The hit was definitely shoulder to shoulder.

The commentator made the comment that the WR was defenseless, but yet the WR was able to duck his shoulder to protect himself. The WR was able to defend himself...he just got the wood laid to him.

To me, this is something that the refs will adjust to eventually. Right now, if it's a big hit, they see it as a targeting penalty. The way I see the rule, that is not the intent...and it's very annoying to me.
 
Targeting penalty and ejection .. Oklahoma's Shepherd still down after a big hit, not helmet to helmet, that stripped the ball. 8 trainers looking at him. 2 penalties on Baylor on the play (targeting and unnecessary roughness).

Shepherd still down after 3 minutes, golf cart coming ..

EDIT: ejection taken back after review. Interesting. It was shoulder to shoulder . And Shepherd is up!

Maybe it's because I'm still not used to these new rules against targeting, but I thought that was about as clean of a hit as it could have been. The hit was definitely shoulder to shoulder.

The commentator made the comment that the WR was defenseless, but yet the WR was able to duck his shoulder to protect himself. The WR was able to defend himself...he just got the wood laid to him.

To me, this is something that the refs will adjust to eventually. Right now, if it's a big hit, they see it as a targeting penalty. The way I see the rule, that is not the intent...and it's very annoying to me.

Agreed. I really hope they change it so they can take back the penalty, not just the ejection, if it is not head to head. It's so stupid now. "Well, it didn't happen, but here's a penalty anyway".
 
I love Stanford's style of play. That's my kind of football.

Over in Waco, Petty is turning up the momentum.

And wow, Stanford just got a break: an interception at the 1 called back for defense e interference .. Got yards out of it instead of a turnover lol dang!
 
I've been switching back between the Baylor/OU and the Oregon/Stanford games. the quality of the broadcast between the two is night and day.

ESPN has it's downfalls, but the alternatives to ESPN are way too far behind.
 
The Fox network sucks. The announcers are terrible, the camera angles are weird, and the ads that box up the screen in steepen plays are annoying. Blech.

This Oregon-Stanford game though. Wow. Stanford is DOMINATING. Eating that clock, pounding the ball, controlling the game. How bout that "old man football"?
 
Oregon picked the worst game of the season to play like a bunch of chumps.

I've heard it discussed of here numerous times before. We always talk about how important gap control is against the Oregon HUNH "Spread Option" offense. Stanford has controlled the LOS as well as their gaps.
 
Back
Top Bottom