This just released from the Tuscaloosa News
The University of Alabama has not self-reported any NCAA violations related to a spring fishing excursion taken by football players Julio Jones and Mark Ingram, but at least one member of the UA compliance staff has flown to Indianapolis to discuss the situation with NCAA enforcement representatives, The Tuscaloosa News has learned. <!--
AC =
--> <!-- GRAY BOX ARTICLE CONTENT--> <!-- /GRAY BOX ARTICLE CONTENT--> Neither Jones nor Ingram has been declared ineligible to play this season, but UA is consulting with the Southeastern Conference to determine whether the matter should be reported as a possible secondary violation.
UA has investigated for the past few months a Gulf Coast fishing trip taken by Jones and Ingram with Curtis Anderson, a 56-year-old resident of Athens who owns a condominium in Gulf Shores.
UA's investigation determined Anderson is not an athletic booster. Student-athletes accepting benefits from a booster, defined as a representative of a school's athletic interests, would be considered a possible major institutional violation of NCAA rules.
UA also determined the excursion did not violate NCAA Bylaw 12.1.2.1.6, which prohibits student-athletes from receiving extra benefits due to their status or reputation as athletes.
For benefits valued at $100 or less, student-athletes can repay the value of the benefit to a charity and continue to compete without losing eligibility. The value of the trip is not known, but UA's investigation determined that Jones and Ingram did not receive any exta benefit due to their status or reputation as athletes.
If Jones and Ingram were determined to have received improper benefits, they would have to be declared ineligible and UA could appeal to have their eligibility reinstated after repayment of the value of the benefit. If the value of the benefit exceeded $100, Jones and Ingram would have to sit out a portion of the season as a penalty.
.