🏈 The Blue Bloods of College Football: A chart ranked by wins, championships, All-American's, Heisman winners, and much more.

[TerryP]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E9pqzmYXMAIf_Rc?format=jpg&name=large

 

[mando]

You are not a blue blood unless you sustain it for a long period of time in my opinion. Down years sure but more up than down. Johnny come latelies do not qualify in my opinion. I agree with the list of 8. Although a couple of those are teetering.

 

[BamaFan615]

Great website that takes every major metric and compares each university. Unbiased. Straight up numbers.

Winsipedia - College football database of all-time records, wins, and statistics

I will say this - while every university tends to have periods of ups and downs, there are a few teams that I don’t see rebounding as well in today’s college football climate. Nebraska would be at the top of that list. Starting to feel like Tennessee might be on that list as well.

 

[Davestwin]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E9pqzmYXMAIf_Rc?format=jpg&name=large

I’ve never put too much stock in rankings based on conference championships. To be conference champion in the SEC is a whole lot harder than in other conferences.

 

[BamaFan334]

Am I wrong in the fact that I do not really consider Texas a Blueblood of college football? Below is a little reasoning. Sure, they rank high on total wins, and I think we can attribute that to a lot of easy games being in the conferences they have been in and opponents they have played against. Plus, they have played more than most on the list.

 

[Bama Guy]

I feel we should rename it Crimsonblood.

 

[#80]

GA, LSU and Oregon being on anyone's blue blood list is comical.

 

['65 Cobra]

Would be nice to see the total scores and whether NCAA sanctioned vacated wins/bowls/etc. are included or disregarded for this exercise.