24and7
Member
It looked to me like his was trying to receive permission to fire… maybe even arguing for permission to fire..He is being very verbal judging his body language..
It looked to me like his was trying to receive permission to fire… maybe even arguing for permission to fire..He is being very verbal judging his body language..
They probably fired him because they wanted a lot of dead people first.. and he foiled it… and he may have took the shot without permission..Read the wording in red. It indicates that he was arrested after the incident & fired.
However, I take the source as internet board chatter. The AP needs to bust their ass to confirm his account. It has HUGE implications for either side of the aisle IF it happenned the way he says.
They probably fired him because they wanted a lot of dead people first.. and he foiled it… and he may have took the shot without permission..
He appeared to be yelling in his mic..IF the account is true, it seems very clear that it was taken without permission. Which is ridiculous. Hell, he should have shot him sooner in my opinion.
Secret Service is part of DHSThinkin' again.
Were those folks DHS or Secret Service?
I thought Secret Service was under Department of Treasury, but it may have changed after 9/11Secret Service is part of DHS
I thought Secret Service was under Department of Treasury, but it may have changed after 9/11