🏈 Suspension possible for Dial as SEC reviews hit on Murray

PhillyGirl

Member
http://blogs.ajc.com/uga-sports-blo...c-reviews-his-hit-on-georgia-qb-aaron-murray/

ATHENS — Georgia athletic director Greg McGarity confirmed Monday the Bulldogs have asked the SEC to review the legality of a hit on Aaron Murray that required him to be helped off the field shortly before halftime in the SEC Championship game. But they need not have bothered; the league office is already looking into it.


Alabama defensive lineman Quinton Dial hit Murray with a above-the-shoulder, helmet-to-helmet strike after Murray threw an interception at the 1:15 mark of the second quarter. Crimson Tide defensive back Ha-Sean Clinton-Dix was in the midst of a 35-yard return when the 304-pound Dial left his feet and made contact with the side of Murray’s helmet toward the end of the play. Murray was out of the play and not in position to make the tackle.

McGarity said he was “stunned” when he saw the replay of the Dial’s hit — he missed it during live-game-action — and immediately moved to make sure the play was going to be reviewed.


“I actually didn’t see the hit until I saw it on YouTube (Sunday),” McGarity said of SEC Commissioner Mike Slive. “It is definitely a play we will submit for review, but I’m sure that’s already being done. “I’m anxious to see what (SEC Commissioner Mike Slive) says about it.”


Steve Shaw, the SEC’s coordinator of officials, has already reviewed the play and determined that Saturday’s referees “missed the call.”


“By rule, you can’t hit a defenseless player above the shoulders,” Shaw told The Birmingham News. “What the determination needs to be is was this a defenseless player and was contact initiated above the shoulders? When we go through video review of it, that’s what we’ll have to determine. And then you as you break it down, did he lead with the head or lead with the shoulder? From game action, it was a personal foul regardless of how we break it down frame by frame.”


That would not have changed the ultimate outcome of the play. Alabama would have retained possession as the personal foul would have occurred well after the interception. But it would have backed it up 15 yards from the point of contact, which was near midfield.


Above-the-shoulders hits and “targeting” defenseless players have been a point of emphasis for the SEC this season and for all of football as the dangers of concussions have become better known. Slive suspended two players — Ole Miss defensive back Trae Elston and South Carolina safety D.J. Swearinger – for one game each for such hits earlier this season. Dial will face the same fate, and the Crimson Tide’s next game is the BCS national championship.
NCAA rules mandate that conference offices review any flagrant personal foul or targeting for possible future punishment, whether a penalty was called on the field or not.


“We do want to stand up for our players when they are in serious danger of being injured,” McGarity said. “This is a case where it could have had serious implications on Aaron, not only in that game but in future games.”
 
Um then they better start crying about Sheldon Dawson pulling a "Brandon Spikes move" on Dee.

Does his statement:

“We do want to stand up for our players when they are in serious danger of being injured,” McGarity said. “This is a case where it could have had serious implications on Aaron, not only in that game but in future games.”

still hold true after this example? .

[video=youtube;Ze9FrbEBp9k]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ze9FrbEBp9k&sns=em[/video]

Tit for tat or in this case an eye for an eye. If he's going to cry about player safety then he better run a squeaky clean program. Oh wait its UGA we are discussing
 
Last edited:
Ive watched that hit about a dozen times and I see Dial leading with his shoulder to block an opposing player making his way to get to a ball carrier. Dial did not lead with his helmet. It looks like a legal hit to me, shoulder to shoulder. Also....i dont think anything would have ever been said if Dial hit an offensive lineman in the same fashion. Maybe im partial....i dunno, but if the role were reversed, id feel the same if it were AJ. "Dial left his feet" I did not see that happen.
 
Last edited:
Here's what AM had to say about it in his post game interview. Pretty classy for a Georgia guy. His comment about the hit is at the 2:15 mark.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/1pCwe4Hov1I" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe>
 
Last edited:
This will really be a key factor in determining the outcome of the BCS championship game. If Dial is allowed to play, Alabama will probably win by 42 to 49 points. If he is not allowed to play, we may only win by 35 or so.
 
The hit *could* have been flagged at the time, but I seriously doubt that it was the type of hit that would be deserving of a suspension. The article, and I use that term lightly, states that Dial "left his feet" which I did not see on any replay. It appeared to me that Dial leaned in with his shoulder. JMHO.
 
I think people are trying to split hairs over nothing myself. This happened after an interception so the qb was a defender so therefore its a legal hit. Case Closed. End of Discussion.
 
I don't know if it was behind the play or what, but it WAS helmet to helmet...maybe for a fraction of a section his shoulder barely touched but it was obvious he was going for the helmet. The possible suspension has nothing to do with him being a defender or not, at least to my knowledge.
 
I don't know if it was behind the play or what, but it WAS helmet to helmet...maybe for a fraction of a section his shoulder barely touched but it was obvious he was going for the helmet. The possible suspension has nothing to do with him being a defender or not, at least to my knowledge.

If you want to start suspending players for every incident where a helmet touches a helmet then you're going to be hard pressed to ever field a team. The helmet to helmet rule is for players who intentionally aim their helmet at another player's helmet...and there's not enough in the video to convince me that that was Dial's intention.
 
Whether or not it should've been called is, to me, secondary at this point. I think the issue is whether or not it's fair to hold players accountable after the fact for calls missed by the refs. It WASN'T called, and whether it should've been is something I'll leave for everyone else to discuss. There was an official right there, and one who gets paid to do the job of officiating. It's not the player's fault that it wasn't called. If they can spend days/weeks mulling it over after the fact, I think they have no choice but to allow for review of potentially "flagrant" missed calls during the game and let them be assessed at the time or on the next punt.
 
Whether or not it should've been called is, to me, secondary at this point. I think the issue is whether or not it's fair to hold players accountable after the fact for calls missed by the refs. It WASN'T called, and whether it should've been is something I'll leave for everyone else to discuss. There was an official right there, and one who gets paid to do the job of officiating. It's not the player's fault that it wasn't called. If they can spend days/weeks mulling it over after the fact, I think they have no choice but to allow for review of potentially "flagrant" missed calls during the game and let them be assessed at the time or on the next punt.

I think that's the thing that bugs me the most. You can't fine someone for a play that wasn't called. If this is how we are gonna do football from now on, hell, let's analyze every single angle of every movement each player on the field after a game JUST IN CASE we missed a dirty/cheap hit ..
 
Whether or not it should've been called is, to me, secondary at this point. I think the issue is whether or not it's fair to hold players accountable after the fact for calls missed by the refs. It WASN'T called, and whether it should've been is something I'll leave for everyone else to discuss. There was an official right there, and one who gets paid to do the job of officiating. It's not the player's fault that it wasn't called. If they can spend days/weeks mulling it over after the fact, I think they have no choice but to allow for review of potentially "flagrant" missed calls during the game and let them be assessed at the time or on the next punt.

I think the college game has started patterning themselves a lot like the NFL when it comes to these calls or lack of calls, reviewing and fining or suspending after the fact. I don't see him getting suspended, but it wouldn't bother me if he did. :tennis:
 
If they want to suspend Dial then I think the SEC should do what the Big-Ten did in 2011 with Ohio State and the Sugar Bowl and delay the suspensions until the beginning of the regular season in 2013.

http://content.usatoday.com/communi...ar-bowl-ohio-state-jim-tressel/1#.UL6yBo7crQc

What is good for the Goose...


That was as bush league as anything holding off the suspension until after the Bowl game., but I don't thnk that was the B1G making that call, strictly OSU.
 
Back
Top Bottom