We've got UGA's defense being touted as "as good as any in the SEC" by many of the pundits before the season started. Of course, that comes with the caveat that their roster is, well, SNAFU to start the season. (S= situation or S= suspensions, your choice.)
Enter Mizzou in their first contest in the SEC.
Last year they were in the top 15 for total offense in the NCAA: but in the Big12. Even with the Big12 in the rear view mirror, they did accomplish something that several of the SEC teams didn't; took care of business against SELA by dropping 62 points before the fat lady sang.
Should we make anything of Georgia allowing Buffalo to score 23 last weekend? If they were trash points I'd say no, but fact is 16 of the 23 came in the first half. I'm sure any Dawg fan would be quick to say, "look at our second half adjustments." But seriously, should you have to be making that kind of change in defensive philosophy?
Perhaps, just perhaps, UGA was looking ahead? Meh, can't say I buy that. If anyone should be looking ahead it would be Mizzou.
There are a few questions about this game we'll throw out for this week.
Vegas is putting the point total at 52.5 on average. IF it's as close of a matchup as they are thinking (UGA -2.5 now) it seems they are thinking both teams will be exchanging touchdowns pretty evenly.
So, we are talking three, maybe four touchdowns a team.
Do you think 52 total points is too much or too little?
The average home field advantage for teams is roughly three points. But, Mizzou carries one of the highest home field advantages in the country considering how much more they score, on average, at home versus how they normally play on the road. With UGA getting -.2.5 Vegas is thinking Mizzou is at least as good as UGA, or a little better.
Who you think wins this one?
Picking the winner gets 1:1 odds.
Picking the spread gets 2:1 odds.
What say you RTB'ers?
Other weekend games here.
Enter Mizzou in their first contest in the SEC.
Last year they were in the top 15 for total offense in the NCAA: but in the Big12. Even with the Big12 in the rear view mirror, they did accomplish something that several of the SEC teams didn't; took care of business against SELA by dropping 62 points before the fat lady sang.
Should we make anything of Georgia allowing Buffalo to score 23 last weekend? If they were trash points I'd say no, but fact is 16 of the 23 came in the first half. I'm sure any Dawg fan would be quick to say, "look at our second half adjustments." But seriously, should you have to be making that kind of change in defensive philosophy?
Perhaps, just perhaps, UGA was looking ahead? Meh, can't say I buy that. If anyone should be looking ahead it would be Mizzou.
There are a few questions about this game we'll throw out for this week.
Vegas is putting the point total at 52.5 on average. IF it's as close of a matchup as they are thinking (UGA -2.5 now) it seems they are thinking both teams will be exchanging touchdowns pretty evenly.
So, we are talking three, maybe four touchdowns a team.
Do you think 52 total points is too much or too little?
The average home field advantage for teams is roughly three points. But, Mizzou carries one of the highest home field advantages in the country considering how much more they score, on average, at home versus how they normally play on the road. With UGA getting -.2.5 Vegas is thinking Mizzou is at least as good as UGA, or a little better.
Who you think wins this one?
Picking the winner gets 1:1 odds.
Picking the spread gets 2:1 odds.
What say you RTB'ers?
Other weekend games here.
