You know, the SEC doesn't just pick a city and say, "you're going to host this championship." The cities bid on each championship (also known as pay money to the SEC). St. Louis must have come up with an attractive compensation plan.
The ACC didn't just pick its location for their football conference championship a few years ago. A lot of cities bid, just like they do in any conference, and Orlando was one of the first "neutral sites" to host the ACCCG.
They still
chose Orlando and it was a still a bad choice. Horrible choice. Attendance looked like a UAB football game and ticket prices for the ACCCG were just as inexpensive, if not a little less. I recall some ticket packages that were downright cheap!
Congrats to St. Louis for a winning bid. It's still a horrible location
choice for the SEC.
A few years ago (I'm thinking it was 2014) the SEC announced what they were doing for the SECT for basketball. Nashville was chosen as the primary location--a good choice. Two other cities, St Louis and Tampa Bay, were selected for two other years. What's really ironic here is when they were announced Slive said bad attendance at Tampa was an anomaly. Funny really, considering the worst attendance the SEC has ever had at a tourney was in Orlando. (Top three Orlando, Atlanta (tornado game,) and Tampa Bay. And they're going back to Tampa in '20, by choice. Like Mizzou, but not to the same extreme, these cities are on the outside of the SEC footprint. (A little over 103K attended this years SECT, 14 games...average of 7000+ per game. Not good.)
If this is all about expanding the footprint for tournaments, okay. Just say so. It leaves me shaking my head a bit considering how many better locations there are to choose from. Hell, there are five or six teams ranked in the top 11-12 that are within a half of a days drive from a location like Nashville or Memphis.