| CURRENT EVENTS Roe vs Wade and all that comes with this story. This guy. I am at a loss for words.

[PurlJam]

Honestly, its only when it fits a narrative.

The anti covid vaccine folks were out voiced

Amazing how the "adjectves" change based on the subject...... Abortion is Pro-Choice but not Pro-Choice for people who choose whether or not to get the vaccines.... spot on about the out voiced there plano, maybe more like screaming the loudest.

 

[It Takes Eleven]

A couple of pretty good perspectives, first on how the debate rushes to the fringe on both sides:

Opinion | The Democrats’ Roe v. Wade Pitfall

Activists push both parties toward the extremes on abortion—and away from most voters.

www.wsj.com

Second, Democrats' silence on the racial disparity of abortion:

Opinion | Why Won’t the Left Talk About Racial Disparities in Abortion?

Scholarly studies show that black women are far likelier to terminate their pregnancies than whites.

www.wsj.com

 

[RollllTide!]

Everything I study about protesting says it is a major crime to do it at a judges home. Why is our government ignoring this? The democrats keep digging their grave with a backhoe.

 

[planomateo]

Everything I study about protesting says it is a major crime to do it at a judges home. Why is our government ignoring this? The democrats keep digging their grave with a backhoe.

Because the left has the DA's.

Schummer is doing exactly what he's going after Trump for.

Remember him calling out Trump for gas prices yet he's not challenged Biden.

Hypocrisy

President has yet to address the leak, has yet to address supreme court Justice safety, etc.

But hey, he can count 195, 6, 7 and 8

 

[planomateo]

I'll ask one question.

How can a mom have rights while the baby doesn't?

 

[ElephantStomp]

Everything I study about protesting says it is a major crime to do it at a judges home. Why is our government ignoring this? The democrats keep digging their grave with a backhoe.

Unless they’re on the judge’s property there’s no crime, can’t charge people for being on a public road or sidewalk

 

[ElephantStomp]

I'll ask one question.

How can a mom have rights while the baby doesn't?

That’s easy…..define baby

 

[RollllTide!]

That’s easy…..define baby

Look at 20 weeks fetus. It's a baby

 

[ElephantStomp]

Because the left has the DA's.

Schummer is doing exactly what he's going after Trump for.

Remember him calling out Trump for gas prices yet he's not challenged Biden.

Hypocrisy

President has yet to address the leak, has yet to address supreme court Justice safety, etc.

But hey, he can count 195, 6, 7 and 8

Schummer is a moron.

There’s hypocrisy from both sides, but now it affects the right, so they’re talking louder about it

How should he address it? He said he’s more concerned with a women’s rights. Justice safety was addressed by Congress, they have more security.

 

[ElephantStomp]

Look at 20 weeks fetus. It's a baby
View attachment 21054

But, there’s a lot on the right that define a baby at conception….so does a clump of cells have rights?

 

[RollllTide!]

But, there’s a lot on the right that define a baby at conception….so does a clump of cells have rights?

Then why don't use birth control to eliminate the controversy

 

[ElephantStomp]

Then why don't use birth control to eliminate the controversy

Maybe dudes should get vasectomies?

 

[TerryP]

Maybe dudes should get vasectomies?

Quick time out here.

Are you male or female? It serves to frame that comment.

 

[TerryP]

Unless they’re on the judge’s property there’s no crime, can’t charge people for being on a public road or sidewalk

If the protests are meant to influence the decision of a judiciary member, it is against the law. It is literally codified, specifically, in the language of the law.

Why are they out there?

I've asked a few questions in this thread and we're, seemingly, in an area where there's no discussion.

As a LEO, you're bringing a view I want to know more about.

 

[ElephantStomp]

If the protests are meant to influence the decision of a judiciary member, it is against the law. It is literally codified, specifically, in the language of the law.

Why are they out there?

I've asked a few questions in this thread and we're, seemingly, in an area where there's no discussion.

As a LEO, you're bringing a view I want to know more about.

Sorry, I didn’t notice your questions. I’m more than open to have a discussion

 

[ElephantStomp]

Quick time out here.

Are you male or female? It serves to frame that comment.

Male

 

[TerryP]

Sorry, I didn’t notice your questions. I’m more than open to have a discussion

Only four pages...make yourself a drink and scroll through the thread.

 

[TerryP]

Male

 

[TerryP]

Sorry, I didn’t notice your questions. I’m more than open to have a discussion

There's one within the post you quoted. Can we start there?

 

[ElephantStomp]

There's one within the post you quoted. Can we start there?

They’re out there protesting a decision they disagree with. It’s a slippery slope arresting and charging people on public property