There was a guy who was bragging on Les Miles a few years ago in terms of Miles being one of--and it may have been the first--to reach 100 wins over a 10 years period. My response to him was "hold up a second. While that's true, he's also one of only a few coaches that have coached in as many games--within a season--to have a chance at reaching that mark.Like him or not, he goes out on top as the all time leader in wins at Oklahoma. He is in high cotton with the names of Wilkerson and Switzer. I wish him well, he has been good for the game of college football.
In a sense that's not a lot different than an older barameter we had for coaching success/team success by judging them on the number of 10 wins seasons: a number that means little when well over 50% of the teams in the NCAA play 13 games.
Here, it's true that he leads to all-time wins list at OU. Personally, I don't put him in the same category as Switzer. When I look at Barry vs Bob, I'm seeing three times more national championships as well as a better winning percentage in conference and overall play.
To add a note, when I look at the standings of the Almost 12 last season there were only three teams with a winning record (or at least .500) in conference play. A lot say it speaks to parity and I agree--parity among some mediocre programs.
He's certainly made his contributions to the sport as well as contributions to individuals careers. As one example, I'd be pretty hard to convince that Spurrier's lone national title comes without his addition of Stoops to the defense at Florida.
So, in the end, we can