🏈 Rapid fire questions relating to expansion

[LBS]

Is Texas A&M alone enough to justify the SEC taking them?

-----
If not, is TCU a good fit and good enough to make it worth while?

-----
Would you argree that other than TAMU and TCU, the only other team "west" that is within reason is Missouri? (note: Missouri is 5 hrs from Fayetteville, 7 from Nashville, and further north than Lexington, KY)

-----
If two is as much as can be grabbed to the west, which two to the East are targeted?

-----
Is there an argument for NOT taking Virginia Tech?

-----
If VT is taken, is it smartest for the other to be in that backyard, for T.V. marketing, travel proximity, and rivalry purposes, or would UK, UT, and USC be close/good enough?

-----
What about the Tar Heel State? I look at NC, NC State, Duke, and Wake and could see one of them willing to entertain the thought of getting out of that. They're like a bag full of angry cats.

-----
What is wrong with the Naval Acadamy? If someone can bring up Maryland, Navy could work. They bring the D.C./Baltimore market, the Army-Navy game, and a nation-wide following.

-----
So it the PAC-10 grabs Texas as a state, will the Rose Bowl, the Fiesta Bowl, and the Cotton Bowl all be PAC-10 bowls?

 

[psychojoe]

As I said in another thread, Missouri would be a reasonable fit for us. It does border Kentucky, Tennessee and Arkansas. Baylor would be a possibility as well as TCU. I think Missouri would prefer the Big 10, but for now it looks like the Big 10 will stop at 12 teams.

Of all the ACC teams mentioned the only one that appeals to me is Va. Tech.

 

['65 Cobra]

We should go after A&M, OK if still available, TCU and Kansas (for basketball)

 

[Crimson&WhiteGecko]

Add Texas A&M along w/ FSU to give UF a stronger run for their division.