Imagine that you have been invited for a lovely yacht cruise from a Mobile Bay marina to a destination like Belize or Barbados. Itâs something youâve talked about for years. You and your friends agree that everyone will love it.
Then you show up at the marina and thereâs just one slight problem: all the materials for a yacht are waiting at the dock, but no one has built the boat. Thereâs enough wood and fiberglass and it floats. So you set sail, or perhaps hand-paddle along, sharks permitting, and build your yacht as you cross the Gulf of Mexicoâs open waters.
That gives you some idea of how collegiate athletic programs are dealing with the new name, image and likeness rules. Since the U.S. Supreme Courtâs Alston vs. NCAA ruling earlier this summer and the subsequent abdication by the NCAA from any leadership role, colleges and conferences are trying to handle individual cases as they come with no instruction kit and, in many cases, a sneaking suspicion that you canât trust anyone else to avoid looking into loopholes for strategic advantages.
https://www.tidesports.com/picture-...s-crimson-tide-practice-august-12/8115968002/
So far, to the surprise of no one, some athletes have prospered in an unregulated free market. Good for them. But in the broader picture, and contradicting the âNIL will help more teams because they will be able to attract recruitsâ narrative, the rich â as they do â appear to be growing decidedly richer.
Take the latest story from Utah. Built Brands, an energy bar company, has entered into an agreement to pay the equivalent of full tuition to 36 walk-on football players. Thatâs a generous gesture even on a one-year basis, and it is financially possible largely because BYU, a richly-endowed religious school, has remarkably low tuition, ranging from $3,000 to $6,000 a year. By comparison, Alabama tuition for 2021 ranges from a little over $10,000 for instate students to over $30,000 for out-of-state tuition. But the details, which are subject to interpretation without an interpreter like the NCAA, raise a fascinating question.
Currently, Alabama, like all FBS schools, has an 85-scholarship limit. Now imagine Nick Saban with an additional 10 full-ride scholarships. The NCAA rules on when a âwalk-onâ becomes a âcounterâ are complicated, but might be gone in a year. Now suppose that some deep-pocketed donor (and Alabama has a few) steps up for tuition-plus, essentially creating a full ride. Thatâs 10 more prospects per year, and while people could say, âoh, they are just walk-ons,â imagine using those 10 full rides on the top 10 prospects in Alabama (lower tuition) and having all 25 of your âotherâ scholarships to recruit out of state.
Not everyone would benefit in the same way, but rest assured that Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson, Texas and Oklahoma, plus a few more, would. Nate Oats would probably like to have 15 scholarships to work with instead of 13, too. And those full-ride sports are nothing compared to what would happen in baseball (especially) and other limited-scholarship sports. At least all the complaints about Vanderbilt using its institutional scholarship programs to supplement baseball would end, and the lottery argument would become moot. Just think how quickly Mississippi State and Ole Miss, or Alabama, could find funding for âwalk-onsâ who would potentially receive more aid than actual signees can.
At some point, conferences may come to some agreement on NIL tuition, although with the floodgates open itâs going to be hard to start setting limits that say players canât get whatever benefit they want. In the meantime, it would be hard on one school in the SEC to draw the line on such an issue when anotherâs interpretation is different. For the moment, everyone is sailing in uncharted waters and trying to build a boat as fast as they can before they are swimming with sharks.
Then you show up at the marina and thereâs just one slight problem: all the materials for a yacht are waiting at the dock, but no one has built the boat. Thereâs enough wood and fiberglass and it floats. So you set sail, or perhaps hand-paddle along, sharks permitting, and build your yacht as you cross the Gulf of Mexicoâs open waters.
That gives you some idea of how collegiate athletic programs are dealing with the new name, image and likeness rules. Since the U.S. Supreme Courtâs Alston vs. NCAA ruling earlier this summer and the subsequent abdication by the NCAA from any leadership role, colleges and conferences are trying to handle individual cases as they come with no instruction kit and, in many cases, a sneaking suspicion that you canât trust anyone else to avoid looking into loopholes for strategic advantages.
https://www.tidesports.com/picture-...s-crimson-tide-practice-august-12/8115968002/
So far, to the surprise of no one, some athletes have prospered in an unregulated free market. Good for them. But in the broader picture, and contradicting the âNIL will help more teams because they will be able to attract recruitsâ narrative, the rich â as they do â appear to be growing decidedly richer.
Take the latest story from Utah. Built Brands, an energy bar company, has entered into an agreement to pay the equivalent of full tuition to 36 walk-on football players. Thatâs a generous gesture even on a one-year basis, and it is financially possible largely because BYU, a richly-endowed religious school, has remarkably low tuition, ranging from $3,000 to $6,000 a year. By comparison, Alabama tuition for 2021 ranges from a little over $10,000 for instate students to over $30,000 for out-of-state tuition. But the details, which are subject to interpretation without an interpreter like the NCAA, raise a fascinating question.
Currently, Alabama, like all FBS schools, has an 85-scholarship limit. Now imagine Nick Saban with an additional 10 full-ride scholarships. The NCAA rules on when a âwalk-onâ becomes a âcounterâ are complicated, but might be gone in a year. Now suppose that some deep-pocketed donor (and Alabama has a few) steps up for tuition-plus, essentially creating a full ride. Thatâs 10 more prospects per year, and while people could say, âoh, they are just walk-ons,â imagine using those 10 full rides on the top 10 prospects in Alabama (lower tuition) and having all 25 of your âotherâ scholarships to recruit out of state.
Not everyone would benefit in the same way, but rest assured that Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson, Texas and Oklahoma, plus a few more, would. Nate Oats would probably like to have 15 scholarships to work with instead of 13, too. And those full-ride sports are nothing compared to what would happen in baseball (especially) and other limited-scholarship sports. At least all the complaints about Vanderbilt using its institutional scholarship programs to supplement baseball would end, and the lottery argument would become moot. Just think how quickly Mississippi State and Ole Miss, or Alabama, could find funding for âwalk-onsâ who would potentially receive more aid than actual signees can.
At some point, conferences may come to some agreement on NIL tuition, although with the floodgates open itâs going to be hard to start setting limits that say players canât get whatever benefit they want. In the meantime, it would be hard on one school in the SEC to draw the line on such an issue when anotherâs interpretation is different. For the moment, everyone is sailing in uncharted waters and trying to build a boat as fast as they can before they are swimming with sharks.