šŸˆ Nico Iamaleava is no longer a Vol after NIL dispute.

This is coming full circle.

Think back about people bitching about a coach being able to move all the while ignoring the buyouts. Now, we've got schools starting with NIL buyouts. I can't say I'm disappointed.

This is exactly what a lot were crying. "Treat them the same." Aight.

It didn't matter whether the statement was directed at the brother of superstar Nico Iamaleava, because the message was clear: pay your NIL buyout or face legal action.
 

Looks like his brother has the same agent. Athletes taking the money and running, schools suing athletes.... quickly becoming something I don't care to watch.
I like the ā€œschools suing athletes ā€œ part. They need to learn about contracts & consequences
 
I like the ā€œschools suing athletes ā€œ part. They need to learn about contracts & consequences
Yep if you want to be grown don't half ass it, be grown.
The whole student athlete thing is a joke for the top earners now anyway. No way they kick a 4 million dollar player off the team for grades, think the same applies to a walk on? Start a minor league and let's go back to college ball.
 
I didn't see how they could pay him. From what I hear, UCLA doesn't have gas money to get to the Cal game.
Their athletic department has lost A LOT of money over the last several years. A LOT!

I want to say this has been running five or six years consecutively. If I remember this right, they were in the red last season to the tune of 21 million or so. They either had a budget of 20 and spent 41, or had a budget that was 30 and they spent over 51 million...I leaning towards the later.
 
Going back to a thread from several weeks ago when I said we're going to see schools cut programs. I believe I used UCLA as as one example. I know I mentioned Stanford.

If you are over 20 million in debt, every year, you have to cut something. It'll end up being Olympic sports programs.
 
Their athletic department has lost A LOT of money over the last several years. A LOT!

I want to say this has been running five or six years consecutively. If I remember this right, they were in the red last season to the tune of 21 million or so. They either had a budget of 20 and spent 41, or had a budget that was 30 and they spent over 51 million...I leaning towards the later.

Why did the Big Ten bring them in then? To get USC and LA market?
 
It just seems like the coaching fraternity should band together to make sure some of these guys did not play football... at least for one year... some of these guys need to be humbled... and be forced to focus on academic scores to be accepted..

For the overwhelming majority, the humbling will come in time. Look no further than all the players who voluntarily hopped into the portal looing for better deals, only to get left standing when the music stopped. Even in Nico's case... he's being humbled to a degree. He's having to play with suck ass UCLA as opposed to a team in the SEC that just made the playoffs.
 
Back
Top Bottom