🏈 NFL could eliminate the extra point. Would college football ever do it?

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell says the NFL could consider abolishing the extra point. Could college football ever do the same?

"It's never really crossed my mind," said Rogers Redding, the secretary-rules editor for the NCAA Football Rules Committee.

"It wouldn't be the end of the world, obviously. It has not been talked about on the committee for the five or six years I've been on it."

Goodell told the NFL Network that the league's competition committee could consider eliminating the PAT in order to add excitement.

"The extra point is almost automatic," Goodell said. "I believe we had five missed extra points this year out of 1,200 some odd (attempts). So it's a very small fraction of the play, and you want to add excitement with every play."

Goodell said one suggested proposal would be having a touchdown be worth seven points instead of six, with the potential for an extra play from scrimmage producing an eighth point. However, if the team failed on going for an eighth point, it would go back to six points.

It's debatable how often teams would take that extra-point option under Goodell's proposal. The NFL two-point conversion rate or attempt rate hasn't dramatically changed in the past decade despite an increase in offense.

NFL kickers converted 99.8 percent of their extra-point attempts in the regular season in 2013. The conversion rate has been high for a while. The rate was 98.1 percent in 2001.

In the college game, Football Bowl Subdivision kickers set a percentage record for the second straight season by converting 97.1 percent of their extra points. Seven years ago, college kickers were making 95.1 percent of PATs.

Sixty-two percent of FBS teams missed no more than one extra point this season. The two-point conversion rate for college football has been around 40 percent to 44 percent in recent seasons.

"Extra points aren't quite automatic in our game," Redding said. "They make far more kicks than they once did. But there's enough that it adds a little bit of drama. By allowing defenses to get the ball, it opens up the possibility where a kick gets blocked and it's returned the other way. Or once in a blue moon there's a safety. There's an element of excitement and surprise (to the extra point)."

In 1988, the NCAA made a rule change awarding teams two points for returning a failed extra point or two-point conversion. The change also brought in the obscure one-point safety rule. If a defensive player is tackled with the ball in his own end zone after an interception, fumble or blocked kick on a conversion try, the tackling team gets one point



Read More Here...
 
In a conversation with a few guys a couple of days ago a guy mentioned he'd like to see a team get 7 for a TD with the option to try for eight running the ball from the two yard line.

If they make it, great. There's eight points. If they don't make it they only end up with six.

I thought it was an intriguing idea.
 
Goodell said one suggested proposal would be having a touchdown be worth seven points instead of six, with the potential for an extra play from scrimmage producing an eighth point. However, if the team failed on going for an eighth point, it would go back to six points.

That sounds stupid as hell and casual fans will be confused. If you take it away just make it where everyone has to try for two.
 
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

If they are gonna change it at all, maybe push the XP back 5-10 yards or something.

Here's something to chew on, Jill.

How often do you pay attention to the extra points in ball games? Is there a bigger waste of 45-60 seconds in a game?

I'd like to think that a change like this would make the TV time go more quickly but we certainly won't lose any designated commercial time.

With the percentages mentioned...certainly seems like a waste of time to me.
 
That sounds stupid as hell and casual fans will be confused. If you take it away just make it where everyone has to try for two.

I like the aspect of it being a gamble. It certainly would add another dimension to coaching.

Think about it for a second. It could make a field goal attempt equal a tie ball game or a one point win based on what the team does after its last touchdown.
 
How much of an impact will this have on kickers and the kicking ? There has to be a salary impact in the future. I'm tempted to ask Chris Sailer how he see's this impacting his business in the future.

So for $26m a year, Roger's creating a kicking issue?

Not to mention fantasy football numbers...(joking)
 
Here's something to chew on, Jill.

How often do you pay attention to the extra points in ball games? Is there a bigger waste of 45-60 seconds in a game?

I'd like to think that a change like this would make the TV time go more quickly but we certainly won't lose any designated commercial time.

With the percentages mentioned...certainly seems like a waste of time to me.

With a 99.8% success rate, they are definitely not the most exciting play. I do watch them, because I am always paranoid about losing by 1 point because of a missed XP (the ultimate fail).

I think a change would be interesting, but unnecessary.
 
[MENTION=19574]riz[/MENTION] The same question crossed my mind when I read your post...and I don't know either.

I'd think they would handled both duties considering the limited roster sizes...so, technically, it's not like a guy would lose his roster spot.
 
<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: dbtech_usertag_mention --> @riz <!-- END TEMPLATE: dbtech_usertag_mention -->The same question crossed my mind when I read your post...and I don't know either.

I'd think they would handled both duties considering the limited roster sizes...so, technically, it's not like a guy would lose his roster spot.

True. I was thinking the same. Although, the value of the kicker would decline dramatically, so?
 
Most kickers handle kickoffs but some punters do too... I have no clue how getting rid of the extra point would devalue the kickers, that makes no sense to me. You think coaches covet kickers for their place kicking rather than a 50 yard field goal with 2 seconds left? Most punters could even kick the damn extra point.
 
True. I was thinking the same. Although, the value of the kicker would decline dramatically, so?

Two thoughts here.

It started with Schiano, and I recall Richt mentioning we should eliminate kick-offs during games. What's the feeling coming from the NFL on that note?

There were almost 40 field goals made in the post season for the NFL in 2013-2014. Quite a number of points in total. The top three guys were from SF, Seattle, and Denver. (There were 11 guys that kicked over 30 in the regular season.)
 
I would like to see more of a challenge for the extra point. We need something that would add 1 point. What is wrong with making the goal post 5 feet narrower? That would add a challenge. Here is a pic of our kickers practising on narrow goal post

374182974_144.jpg
 
I would like to see more of a challenge for the extra point. We need something that would add 1 point. What is wrong with making the goal post 5 feet narrower? That would add a challenge. Here is a pic of our kickers practising on narrow goal post

374182974_144.jpg

I like this idea.

I don't like the idea of getting rid of the point altogether, I think if we are gonna make any changes at all, that they should just make it a bit more difficult for the kickers. Such as narrow goalposts, moving back the kick, etc.
 
Back
Top Bottom