🏈 My take on Anthony Grany (it is sort of a long)

bamaraider

Verified Member
Member
I'm a huge fan of A-Grant, I remember going to his first game as a HC at Alabama and chatting with people who follow Bama B-Ball and they said " we'll give him about 3 years". Well as we know he exceeded expectations in his 2nd year really and got us close. This year we were a optimistic team really and many doubted him if he was losing control of his team due to the suspensions. Well rewind a little bit before the start of the season and you glance at the Preseason Top 25 and Bama is #15, many thought we were at least a Sweet 16 team such as myself. We start great winning 7 in a row, end badly losing the 3 of the last 4. Any ways what I'm trying to say, Coach A-Grant has really brought this team back up but the only problem with exceeding expectations is bigger ones come back, many Bama fans said "I'm just glad we're back in it", well what if next year we're more than just a mediocre team and we have a high seeding in the NCAA Tourn. Do you think Anthony Grant is the guy to lead us in that direction? To beat teams like the Kentucky's, the Florida's, etc.. And not just on a fluke season, I mean beating top tier teams every year. As a fan of all sports, Football and Basketball are definitely at the top, so I may focus more and have bigger expectations more than your usual fan. My take on him, is I think he is the guy but he do some very questionable things. The back-to-back Timeouts was one of those today, but not just that his substitution patterns but overall the number 1 priority is FIXING THE OFFENSE, I can't stand watching no name colleges have at least 2 guys that can shoot it from outside the ark, just unbelievable.
 
I know at times I can be a little negative...but good night. 4.5 seconds left; you either run your play or you call time out. You DO NOT run half of your time out and then call a time out. In my opinion... as well as we shot this game should not have been close.
 
I'm a huge fan of A-Grant, I remember going to his first game as a HC at Alabama and chatting with people who follow Bama B-Ball and they said " we'll give him about 3 years". Well as we know he exceeded expectations in his 2nd year really and got us close. This year we were a optimistic team really and many doubted him if he was losing control of his team due to the suspensions. Well rewind a little bit before the start of the season and you glance at the Preseason Top 25 and Bama is #15, many thought we were at least a Sweet 16 team such as myself. We start great winning 7 in a row, end badly losing the 3 of the last 4. Any ways what I'm trying to say, Coach A-Grant has really brought this team back up but the only problem with exceeding expectations is bigger ones come back, many Bama fans said "I'm just glad we're back in it", well what if next year we're more than just a mediocre team and we have a high seeding in the NCAA Tourn. Do you think Anthony Grant is the guy to lead us in that direction? To beat teams like the Kentucky's, the Florida's, etc.. And not just on a fluke season, I mean beating top tier teams every year. As a fan of all sports, Football and Basketball are definitely at the top, so I may focus more and have bigger expectations more than your usual fan. My take on him, is I think he is the guy but he do some very questionable things. The back-to-back Timeouts was one of those today, but not just that his substitution patterns but overall the number 1 priority is FIXING THE OFFENSE, I can't stand watching no name colleges have at least 2 guys that can shoot it from outside the ark, just unbelievable.

Here's something for you to consider.

If you look at the top 25 leading scorers in the NCAA this season, 23 of the 25 are upper classmen: Jr's or Sr's. There are two sophomores, one we just faced in Creighton's McDermott and the other a shooting guard that plays for Maryland.

#1 shooter from beyond the arc? A senior.
 
I'm a huge fan of A-Grant, I remember going to his first game as a HC at Alabama and chatting with people who follow Bama B-Ball and they said " we'll give him about 3 years". Well as we know he exceeded expectations in his 2nd year really and got us close. This year we were a optimistic team really and many doubted him if he was losing control of his team due to the suspensions. Well rewind a little bit before the start of the season and you glance at the Preseason Top 25 and Bama is #15, many thought we were at least a Sweet 16 team such as myself. We start great winning 7 in a row, end badly losing the 3 of the last 4. Any ways what I'm trying to say, Coach A-Grant has really brought this team back up but the only problem with exceeding expectations is bigger ones come back, many Bama fans said "I'm just glad we're back in it", well what if next year we're more than just a mediocre team and we have a high seeding in the NCAA Tourn. Do you think Anthony Grant is the guy to lead us in that direction? To beat teams like the Kentucky's, the Florida's, etc.. And not just on a fluke season, I mean beating top tier teams every year. As a fan of all sports, Football and Basketball are definitely at the top, so I may focus more and have bigger expectations more than your usual fan. My take on him, is I think he is the guy but he do some very questionable things. The back-to-back Timeouts was one of those today, but not just that his substitution patterns but overall the number 1 priority is FIXING THE OFFENSE, I can't stand watching no name colleges have at least 2 guys that can shoot it from outside the ark, just unbelievable.

I'm not picking on you raider, just happened to be scrambling for time this morning. I've got one more point to make—actually more than that—but here's one that is definitely worth consideration.

I'm going to use football and the QB position as an example.

When AJ first took over last year he wasn't given the ability, which is probably not the best word to use here, to make audibles when he got under center. So, he's reading a defense with one outlet play for the run and one outlet play for the pass. He's limited, not because of his ability but because of his lack of experience reading defenses.

Let's fast forward to the middle of the season. He's allowed more leeway by the coaching staff because he has progressed in learning how to read defenses. Now, that's given around 10 seconds in the huddle and on average about 15 seconds at the line of scrimmage to read the defense, make the adjustment call, and call for the snap.

On basketball...

Yesterday we were looking at 4 seconds on the clock. Creighton, in a smart coaching move, made a defensive adjustment on our inbounds play. As soon as Grant saw the adjustment he called a second time out. Now we have a little over 2 seconds left on the clock.

How young and inexperienced are our players on this squad? Very.

So, we are to expect a kid with a year under his belt to be able to make that read, make the necessary adjustment, and proceed on a pressured in-bounds play?

It's simply not that simple. A squad of Jr.'s? Sure. They've been there before and have the experience to see, then react without hesitation. Our guys now? Sure, they can see it, and sure they can make the adjustments. But, within four seconds?

Three years for a football coach is one thing. Three years for a basketball coach when he can only bring in a couple of players each year? It's too short of a period.

By no means am I making a comparison between Coach K and Coach Grant in terms of coaching ability. He simply hasn't had that much experience. But, I do think a good note to consider is it took Coach K over a decade to win his first NC. 12 years, if I recall correctly.

Some coaches you can tell are in over their head. Wendall is one example right now. His team wasn't even competitive in their first round loss in the SEC tourney. (Being fair, his team has been killed with injuries this season but I'm not seeing signs of progress. With him, I don't believe he can get it done.)

We'll know more about Grant in the 2014-2015 season. At that point we'll see just what he's capable of accomplishing. He'll have brought in a full roster—as in the entire roster will be his and he'll have graduated some leaders who will have contributed to the maturation of some of our younger players.

The season didn't meet our expectations for reasons like you've mentioned. But, those expectations needed to be tempered. In hindsight we realize this. For next season, we need to exercise the same—temper expectations.
 
The timeout is indefensible. I don't think Anthony Grant is a stupid man or even a bad bench coach, but he made an enormous mistake in a late game situation of a NCAA tournament game. His initial strategy off of the missed FT of not calling a timeout was the right one IMO. Releford had the ball and you let him take his man off the dribble and attack the rim so he has a shot at getting fouled. However, Creighton was smart and used its foul to give with 4.4 seconds left. THIS IS WHEN YOU HAVE TO CALL A TIMEOUT. RIGHT HERE. Hell, we have 2 freaking timeouts left so even after burning one you can still use the other if you don't like Creighton's defensive setup. Every coach in the country would've called a timeout there and if Anthony Grant got a do-over, he would too. Once we inbound the ball it's over from a coaching standpoint. You have to trust your players and you can't call a timeout with 2+ seconds left on the clock. The difference between 2+ seconds and 4+ seconds is huge right there. Then the play we ran was garbage too. Get Releford a look from 3? WTF? I guess it's tough to really blame anyone when there's that little time left.

Had they called the foul at the end, which was undoubtedly a foul on replay, we might've been able to laugh this one off. Releford is a ~80% FT shooter and he only had to make 2 of 3. The officiating wasn't bad, but the fact that they're more than happy to call the most retarded of flops, but then won't call it when a guy gets hit on his shooting arm and the ball goes 5 feet short of the rim is annoying.

Next year completely depends on how our current freshman progress and no one can accurately predict that. I hope our guys become better shooters though. You ain't gonna win big in college basketball by being one of the worst teams in the nation in 3 pt %. Hell, I just want to become a mediocre 3 point shooting team. Also, I know I'm one of the few, but I want Mitchell to come back if he's going to play hard. I don't care about his whining and pouting either. Just go back to playing hard on the court. Our front line is going to suck next year most likely. Jacobs, Engstrom, Gueye. YIKES.

If we go to the tournament next year, it will probably have been Grant's best coaching job at Bama. It sucks that last year's team couldn't have been this year. With the crappy bubble this year we'd have gotten in as a higher seed and been dangerous a la NC State this year.
 
Last edited:
If I were the ref, I wouldn't have called a foul on that last second shot.

He was as off-balance as someone could be on the shot and while it looked like he may have been pushed...I just don't see it that way.

Next year? Let's wait until we see what happens with the one slot we have.

We need to be able to pull a couple of kids in that are two and outs at the longest. Then, and not until, will I start saying "this is a sweet 16 type team."
 
It appears to me that part of the defensive strategy is to p--- around on offense for 35 seconds in order to keep the ball from the opponent(they can't score if they don't have the ball). If so, I would rather Bama lose 80-60 every game. Had Bama hit 30% of the good shots they had and DIDN'T TAKE against Creighton they would have won easily.
 
It appears to me that part of the defensive strategy is to p--- around on offense for 35 seconds in order to keep the ball from the opponent(they can't score if they don't have the ball). If so, I would rather Bama lose 80-60 every game. Had Bama hit 30% of the good shots they had and DIDN'T TAKE against Creighton they would have won easily.

I agree with you and it's so annoying. The only alpha male on the team is JaMychal and he's gone now. He's the only guy who wants to shoot and looks for his shot. All the other guys act like it's a freaking burden to shoot. The guy who is the most guilty is Lacey IMO. This kid AVERAGED 30 PPG in high school. Think of how many shot attempt you have to take to score 30 every night and now he comes to college and he's afraid to let it go unless the shot clock is winding down or he's WIDE OPEN. I don't even care about his high recruiting ranking. I've seen this kid play and he's shown flashes this year and he has a good looking shot. Why is he not actively looking to score? This is college dude, good shots aren't always wide open shots. If a defender is playing a little off of you and you can shoot the ball without changing from your normal shooting motion, that's a good, open shot for you (Lacey). I don't know if he's just an unsure freshman or that's just his mental makeup.
 
My take is this about the last 5 secs of the game. When we were fouled, 2 set plays should've been called; 1 versus zone and the other versus man. IMHO, we should've gotten the ball into Green and give him a chance. We more than likely would've gotten a foul call on a shot down inside.
 
If I were the ref, I wouldn't have called a foul on that last second shot.

He was as off-balance as someone could be on the shot and while it looked like he may have been pushed...I just don't see it that way.

Next year? Let's wait until we see what happens with the one slot we have.

We need to be able to pull a couple of kids in that are two and outs at the longest. Then, and not until, will I start saying "this is a sweet 16 type team."

So you wouldnt call a foul when the defender hits the shooter on the elbow (on his shooting arm) as he's shooting?! :chat_headscratch: so why call any foul at any time then?
 
To me there was a foul even before TR got into his shooting motion. He had started his drive and the defender bumped him off course. Contact like that is a foull when the defender gains an advantage, which clearly happened. TR was already off balance when he went into his shooting motion. To go back to the time out issue, you could tell from the way Creighton was lined up that they were in zone. If you were going to take a TO that should have been done before the ball was inbounded. Barkley commented, and I agree, that we should have just played on once we inbounded. Even against zone Steele was open from about 15 along the base line.I agree entirely with the comment about the younger players being almost afraid to shoot. During the season Cooper and Randolph were also bad about passing up open looks. If we are going to be dancing in the sweet sixteen next year we need to add some firepower. Some of that should happen with normal freshman to sophomore improvement. It definitely would be a good thing to add a recruit or so.
 
Back
Top Bottom