💬 Mike Leach: Nothing special about SEC or its offensive schemes

If Phil Longo fails to pan out as Ole Miss' offensive coordinator, Longo's mentor Mike Leach says it won't be because the SEC is too tough for the style of offense that he will run.

"I've got bad news for all these levels people," Leach told the Jackson Clarion-Ledger in a story about Longo. "Your level isn't special, your conference isn't special. All this different level this, different level that. That's crazy.

"How is it better? Somebody coaches better athletes, somehow they morph into something smarter, that's crazy. I mean, you still have problems, you still have 11 parts you can wiggle around to counter the other 11 parts."

A late-1990s visit with Leach spawned Longo's up-tempo scheme that produced eye-popping numbers at multiple small schools, most recently FCS-level Sam Houston State. But just because he has not done it at a major conference does not mean Longo's scheme can't work somewhere like the SEC, said Leach, now the head coach at Washington State.

Leach feels certain in that belief because he once directed an offense that lit up SEC scoreboards.

Leach joined longtime partner Hal Mumme as Kentucky's offensive coordinator and quarterbacks coach for the 1997 and 1998 seasons, and their wide-open passing attack was instantly effective.

Behind the combination of quarterback Tim Couch and wide receiver Craig Yeast, the 1998 Wildcats ranked 11th nationally in scoring offense (35.9 points per game), with Couch passing for 4,275 yards en route to becoming the first player selected in the 1999 NFL draft.

"First it becomes it won't work," Leach said. "Second, they basically say oh it's a system, suggesting that people who don't do it that way, who just run it up the middle, stick all your asses together so one hand grenade can kill everybody, that's the right way to do it. Since they do it the right way, they're OK with the fact they lost."

In Leach's two seasons at Kentucky, the Wildcats set six NCAA records, 41 SEC records and 116 Kentucky records -- a two-year period during which Kentucky went 12-11 largely because its defense was as ineffective as its offense was prolific.

Leach followed that run of success at Kentucky by directing an explosive Oklahoma offense in 1999 and then gaining national acclaim for his offensive mind as head coach at Texas Tech and Washington State.

At each stop, Leach countered skepticism over his offensive style with numbers that are impossible to argue against, and he implied his skeptics were loudest when he arrived in the SEC. Even in a rough-and-tumble, run-heavy league -- perhaps especially because of that mentality -- his offense produced.

And though he's nearly 20 years removed from coaching in the SEC, Leach says not much has changed about offensive philosophy within the conference.

"This is a great time to be in the SEC, everybody's got the same offense: run right, run left, play-action," Leach told the newspaper. "And they tease themselves and say we threw it four more times a game this year than we did last year."

Wazzu coach Leach takes shots at SEC offenses
 
In Leach's two seasons at Kentucky, the Wildcats set six NCAA records, 41 SEC records and 116 Kentucky records -- a two-year period during which Kentucky went 12-11 largely because its defense was as ineffective as its offense was prolific.

Is this a case of using numbers to support a weak argument? Yes, Kentucky went 12-11 over that two year period. It seems it's equally important to note--since this article is about SEC football--he was 6 - 10 in conference play with those six wins coming against teams that were 11-37 overall in conference play.

Leach's win's SEC teams:

1.png
 
Well, Pirate Man, East Washington put 45 points on your D and you lost. Boise St put 31 points on your D and you lost. Colorado put 38 points on your D and you lost. Washington put 45 points on your D and you lost. Then to cap the bowl season your mighty offense managed 12 points against Minnesota and you lost. Seems like a lot of wolfing for a perennial bottom tier, no defense, 5 loss, pac-12 team.
 
Not to mention he's 1-3 against SEC schools as a HC of Texas Tech and Washington State.

Well, Pirate Man, East Washington put 45 points on your D and you lost. Boise St put 31 points on your D and you lost. Colorado put 38 points on your D and you lost. Washington put 45 points on your D and you lost. Then to cap the bowl season your mighty offense managed 12 points against Minnesota and you lost. Seems like a lot of wolfing for a perennial bottom tier, no defense, 5 loss, pac-12 team.

exactamundo!!!

if you can't outscore your opponent, then it doesn't matter how prolific your offense is.

and the first post mentions that, while at kentucky, they broke all kinds of records yet still went 12-11. records don't mean shit if the wins aren't there to support them.
 
exactamundo!!!

if you can't outscore your opponent, then it doesn't matter how prolific your offense is.

and the first post mentions that, while at kentucky, they broke all kinds of records yet still went 12-11. records don't mean **** if the wins aren't there to support them.

rOSfVKy.png
 
I kind of agree with him. Don't see the point in comparing the 1999 SEC info to what's happening in today's game. This year was brutal for the SEC.

We just watched an offense with the best talent in the country go like 1/12 on third downs, and spent the last 2 games trying to make sure the offense doesn't lose the game.

IMO he's right about the O's not being special, especially this season... But the defenses are another story. And usually, the D is the Difference.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom