🏈 ./MCP/offensive+grades/output video:

[Guest]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IJPRTZK6E8[/youtube]

End of Video...

End of Line...

 

[BAMAFSTBACK]

C+ on the recievers? Did the talking vacuum cleaner take into consideration the penalties in the Kentucky game?

 

[Guest]

Good stuff MCP, end of line.

 

[Guest]

;tr

 

[Guest]

C+ on the recievers? Did the talking vacuum cleaner take into consideration the penalties in the Kentucky game?

./reply/output post:

Penalties are irrelevant.

Alabama does not have a single receiver in the SEC top 10.

Coach Saban himself has commented more than once about receivers failing to gain separation.

If not for the points given to the receivers for run blocking, the grade would have been lower.

End of Line...

 

[BAMAFSTBACK]

C+ on the recievers? Did the talking vacuum cleaner take into consideration the penalties in the Kentucky game?

./reply/output post:

Penalties are irrelevant.

Alabama does not have a single receiver in the SEC top 10.

Coach Saban himself has commented more than once about receivers failing to gain separation.

If not for the points given to the receivers for run blocking, the grade would have been lower.

End of Line...

I can compute that. Word.

 

[Guest]

This freaking computer is great. I just sat back in my chair and listened to what was probably one of the best posts on the board this year, as far as breaking down the offense goes.

I really like the MCP and hope he sticks around. It's entries encompass all of the joy of a good post without the hassle of having to read it.

How could it get any better than that? Thanks, MCP.

 

[reger60]

I love MCP but I still miss Crimson Vulcan.