šŸ’¬ LSU and the anthem? Lawmakers threatened state funding if players protested, spokesman says

A Washington Post column about Republican attitudes toward colleges on Friday includes an anecdote about Louisiana state legislators allegedly threatening funding for LSU if any player took part in the "take a knee" protests during the national anthem.

LSU players aren't on the field during the "Star Spangled Banner," and it's unclear who was among the "group of Louisiana legislators" who made the threat that LSU President F. King Alexander described in the column.

A university spokesman said the threat came in a phone call but wouldn’t name the legislators involved.

In the column, which ran under the headline "Why do so many Republicans hate college?," writer Catherine Rampell describes a dinner in New York last month that "about a dozen" college presidents attended. Rampell introduces the LSU anecdote as an example of "showdowns with peacocking, publicity-stunting politicians."

She writes: "A group of Louisiana legislators recently threatened to further slash public higher-ed appropriations — already down 43 percent per student since 2008 — if any student football players took a knee during the national anthem, according to Louisiana State University President F. King Alexander. (The threat was withdrawn after Alexander reminded lawmakers that LSU players traditionally remain in the locker room during the anthem.)"

No other details are offered in the column. The state budget took effect July 1 — prior to the attention on the NFL's "take a knee" protests and before LSU's football season began. Lawmakers haven't yet begun formal work for the upcoming budget cycle, which includes a looming $1 billion shortfall that could threaten higher education funding.

ā€œI can confirm the phone call occurred, but we won’t name the person, as that was an unfortunate comment that is better left in the past. We hope that in the future, LSU’s state appropriations will be tied to its performance in the classrooms and laboratories and its economic contributions to our state,ā€ Jason Droddy, interim Vice President of communications, said in an email Friday night.

While several lawmakers this fall publicly questioned the subsidies that the state gives to the New Orleans Saints professional football team after players knelt during the anthem, such a threat hasn't previously been reported on the college level.

House Republican Caucus Chair Lance Harris, R-Alexandria, told The Advocate on Friday that he had not heard about the incident described in the Washington Post column.

NFL players across the country this season have taken part in "take a knee" protests against racism as the "Star Spangled Banner" played before games. Critics of the movement have called it disrespectful to the flag and the military.

Rep. Kenny Havard, R-St. Francisville, said in September that the state should reconsider the lucrative incentives that it pays to keep the NFL franchise in New Orleans after 10 Saints players sat on the bench during the national anthem before a game at Carolina.

"If it's a state-subsidized sporting event, that's not the place to protest," Havard told The Advocate at the time, though he specifically spoke in the context of the Saints after the protest by the pro players. LSU has one of the few self-sustaining athletics programs in the country that doesn't receive state subsidies.

LSU running back Derrius Guice, through his Twitter account, posted about the protests that week, suggesting he would sit or kneel during the anthem. As college players are normally not present on the field during the anthem, nothing came of Guice's taunt.

LSU and the anthem? Lawmakers threatened state funding if players protested, spokesman says
 
unfortunately, if it's a state-subsidized event, they can not stop them from protesting in that manner. protests are covered and protected under the first amendment. and if they do try to stop them or punish them in any way, then the school and/or players would have a valid complaint with the legislature.

also, understand that i do not agree with the whole kneeling thing. but i do agree with The Constitution and the rights laid out in it. so if someone wants to kneel during the National Anthem, that is their right. but they also need to understand that i don't have to like it; even though i will defend their choice to do so.
 
If the Universities are smart enough to continue the tradition of keeping the kids in the locker room this shouldn't be an issue. You can bet the cajun legislature had no earthly idea that this was the case. Hopefully drawing attention to racism can eventually find another avenue of expression, for everyone's sake.
 
if it's a state-subsidized event,
There's an interesting point, sk33tr. It's one I've not considered. Are football games considered a state-subsidized an event? The "bill" goes to the athletic department. It's one of the areas listed with "game day expenses," I assume.
 
No. 1, so these wonderful "constitutional Republicans" aren't even pretending to give a shit about the constitution anymore if it goes against something they agree with.

No. 2, they are so gotdamn stupid they dont even realize college teams are in the locker room for the anthem.

This is pretty similar to something I had to answer earlier this year. I had four or five people coming to me almost screaming about why I hadn't said anything (I guess an angry column or something) about Enterprise's football players kneeling during the anthems this year. I asked the (very old) gentlemen had they even been to an Enterprise game this season? No. I asked had they been to a high school game at all this year? No. I asked when the last time they had ever been to a high school game? Shrugs from all. I proceeded to tell them that Enterprise, nor any high school in the state that I'm aware of, plays that National Anthem with the players on the field. And not shockingly they all still argued and said that they trust the people that had told them and that I should be ashamed for defending these evil players, they would be going to TV.
 
No. 1, so these wonderful "constitutional Republicans" aren't even pretending to give a shit about the constitution anymore if it goes against something they agree with.
Don't go there, Bird. You can't make it about Republicans considering how the last administration willfully ignored the constitution: violated it more than once.

A dumb move, sure. But to break this down along party lines is as short sighted of a comment I've seen you make here.
 
Back
Top Bottom