Ah, ya got me (all the while knowing I was talking about his frosh year, right?)
No, not at all. Tua wasn't on the team that year, and I was never speaking to that game.
To the rest of your post.... please tell me what is a good example ? The title game is a bad example. The Auburn game is a bad example. The Clemson game is a bad example. The Washington game was a bad example. The LSU games are a bad example. The Mississippi State game is a bad example.
It's like
@Tidestalker said a hundred pages ago... are all of you basing Hurts ability to play QB on his success vs Chattanooga ?
Stahp it !
The best examples are the ones vs the best competition, and there is no longer a debate about how effective Hurts is vs those teams. It's not an opinion anymore. Why is this so hard for some to acknowledge ?
Maybe we should all try another angle to see if we can find some common ground ?
How about what else does Tua have to do to prove he is better than Jalen ?
Should the best player not start, or is this everybody gets to play, and everybody gets a trophy ?
Tua showed nothing but excellence last season. Every time he got PT everyone in the stadium marveled at his abilities.
Everyone in Bama nation owes Tua for their latest title they get to celebrate, and its not debatable. What else does he have to do other than stay healthy ?
Why are some people in this discussion propping Hurts up, when its Tua that saved the day ? We literally could not have had a more clear cut example of these two players abilities vs good competition in the title game. Please no more excuses. The game was played, and we saw exactly what each QB brings to the table. Especially on the big stage with everything on the line the fraud was exposed, and the real deal stepped forward. It sounds harsh, but it is REALITY.
It leaves me shaking my head that people dismiss that game as some kind of anomaly. " not a fair comparison ?!? "
Wake up people, its the only comparison ! Take it and believe it.