šŸˆ Getting a kick out of VT fan predictions.

Big_Fan

Verified Member
Member
I was reading a message board on another site where a VT fan commented that the match-ups favored VT. He said - Defense is a toss-up, Special Teams - who knows? Offense to VT.

That is hilarious.

It really is.

The more I read up on Tyrod Taylor, the better I feel about our chances at handing VT an ugly loss. I really don't see this game being that close.

First half will be close unless Taylor throws a few pics.

Second half we will run away with it.
 
I've seen some good discussions here and there about the two offenses compared to each other.

But, the sucker I am wants to know...

What's his reason for the offense going VT's way?
 
Yes, that is indeed a puzzle. VT is not well equipped to attack the part of our defense that isn't dominant, the secondary. They depend on the run, so they will have to succeed, if they do, against our front seven, this with a suspect offensive line.
 
2. The Underachieving Hokie O-Line Some preview magazines are actually insane enough to tout Virginia Tech’s offensive line as a TEAM STRENGTH. Lindy’s boasts of VaTech’s 70 returning starts at O-Line!!! wut?? If you have paid any attention, VT’s struggles up front have terrorized this team for at least 2 years. Is it a benefit to return 70 starts / 3 starters on a terrible offensive line?


The Hokie O-Line gave up 42 sacks in ā€˜08. VaTech attempted only 291 passes. That’s a sack to pass-attempt ratio of 12.81%, WORST IN THE COUNTRY by 2+ percentage points. It was the same story in ā€˜07.
ā€œReturning startsā€ is one of the most misleading stats in football, and it’s a horrible indicator of a team’s potential. Let’s look at the projected starting five:

* LT – Ed Wang – SR – 2 year starter…Sounds great! Except for the fact that he’s a former tight end and a former right tackle. This will only be his second year ever at LT.
* LG – Sergio Render – SR – 3 year starter…Best OLineman on the team, 2<sup>nd</sup> team all-ACC, the real deal. But he’s moving from RG to LG for 2009. So 39 career starts, but none at his current position. It shouldn’t matter too much, but there may be an adjustment. And if he gets hurt, holy ****. There goes ā€œhalfā€ your experience.
C – Beau Warren – JR …Started 2 games in ā€˜07 and was a backup in ā€˜08. Almost all of his experience is as a backup, cleaning up in blowouts.
* RT – Blake DeChristopher – SO ….Started 11 games last year, but was thrown into the fire too early. He’s allegedly improving, although the VT website says he split Spring reps with another RT (Lanier). Is that a good sign? A lot of previews suggest he will show his ā€œpotentialā€ this year. Based on what? A big leap of faith.
RG – Jaymes Brooks – SO…One career start. A complete unknown. But like everyone else in the offseason, he has ā€œpotentialā€.


So if you count actual starts at current positions, the number of returning starts drops from 74 to 32. Putting together a patchwork line with only one stud doesn’t give me a lot of expectations for 2009. The line may ā€œimproveā€ only because it’s impossible for them to play any worse. But if the Hokies have designs on an MNC run, the O-Line will have to play out of their minds and stay healthy all year long. That, my friends, is a very long shot.


By the way, some suggest that VT gives up more sacks because of their mobile QB. A failed QB draw resulting in a loss of yards is chalked up as a sack. But by that same rationale, can’t you suggest that Taylor also runs his way OUT OF a number of potential sacks? Regardless, the numbers are ****ing ugly. Finally, I’ve seen the word ā€œdepthā€ tossed around. Does anyone even read a roster anymore? VTech only has about 7 guys who have ever PLAYED O-Line in a college game. That is not depth, that is simply warm bodies. The Hokies are a key injury or two away from needing duct tape and twine to keep their front 5 in tact.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I heard alot of similar talk just before the Sugar Bowl last year....and Im as guilty as the next guy.....VT will be ALOT more prepared than GA was last year.....IMO


BINGO! I read alot on message boards about how some lowly team from a puny little conference couldnt hang with an SEC powerhouse. Utah had no shot. How's that first quarter working out for us? :swear:

VT will be more prepared than Clemson and UGA even thought about. Beamer is more experienced and will have his boys ready to play.

Fan predictions on boards are nothing more than a watse of bandwith.
 
None of them have a clue. Especially the odds makers. They REALLY don't have a clue until about the third week. Which reminds me (along with the $10k or so he brings back every year) why my brother spends the first two weeks of every season in Las Vegas.
 
Last edited:
Its our O vs their D.

  • VT is built to run first. We are built to stop the run first.
  • TT can run, and thats all. Poor accuracey, look at his stats. 2 tds, 7ints.
  • Their WRs and RBs (leading) were all freshman last year, now Sophs.
  • Their O-line has gone through tons of injuries and shuffling. Some of these guys have no experince.
  • Their weakest point on O is our weakest point on D. Throw some floaters out there and they will get picked off.
I say let TT stand in the pocket. Could anyone say, "Hey, thats Taylor kid really picked us apart. What a great QB he is." No.

They have a fast and stingy defense. Thats where the game will be interesting. How long before we put it together and move the ball. Or is it like last year where we came flying out of the gate. VT's D is tougher, i know that.
 
Last edited:
Bama will try to run right at them. I think they replace a couple of their linebackers and their DE's are speed rushers. Throw some screens, etc to slow that rush down or just run off tackle. ;)
 
Up until last night I was most concerned with out Punting game. Barring busted plays or missed assignments, I don't expect VT to be overly successful versus the Bama D (perhaps 13-16 offensive points), so with two tough Defenses, usually the punting game is the key. Last year Bama ranked 9th in the SEC in net punting. Not good. So I decided to take a look at the national rankings. Bama was 60th in net punting. Virginia Tech was... 92nd. Hmmm. I wonder how Bama ranked in punt defense. 61st, at just under 9 yards/return and 1 TD. VT was... wait for it... 103rd. They gave up 12.5 yards per return and 3 TD's. Was this a down year for VT or part of a trend?
 
I really liked this part:
but I don’t think VT’s ’09 schedule is easy. Playing Alabama in Atlanta on opening night…is that going to be easy? Superhuman Bama DT Terrence Cody vs. that crummy V-Tech offensive line? That’s going to be easy, if by ā€œeasyā€ you mean ā€œterrifyingā€. Alabama may be the worst possible opener for this VaTech team. Both of the major offensive weaknesses will be exposed. Taylor playing in a rambunctious Georgia Dome, against a team with a ferocious D-Line that will manhandle the line, stuff the run, force the pass, and chase Taylor all over the field?
I hope the Hokie D brings that stupid lunchpail to Atlanta, because the VT offense ain’t scoring more than 17.
 
Up until last night I was most concerned with out Punting game. Barring busted plays or missed assignments, I don't expect VT to be overly successful versus the Bama D (perhaps 13-16 offensive points), so with two tough Defenses, usually the punting game is the key. Last year Bama ranked 9th in the SEC in net punting. Not good. So I decided to take a look at the national rankings. Bama was 60th in net punting. Virginia Tech was... 92nd. Hmmm. I wonder how Bama ranked in punt defense. 61st, at just under 9 yards/return and 1 TD. VT was... wait for it... 103rd. They gave up 12.5 yards per return and 3 TD's. Was this a down year for VT or part of a trend?

On a few threads here I've tried to point to the fact that ol' "Beamer Ball" hasn't existed in Blacksburg. They've been average on their special teams.

If you get a chance, look up what they averaged last year in punt and kick returns.

IF they don't have significant improvement in these two areas, Javy is going to have 100+ yards in returns.
 
The more I study this matchup the more confident I become. Everyone says how dominant VT's defense is but they are comparable to Clemson's.

Check these 2008 stats out.

Clemson Defense.

PPG: 17.3

RYPG: 127.4

PYPG: 172.5

TYPG: 299.9

--------------
Va Tech

PPG: 16.7

RYPG: 104.4

PYPG: 175.0

TYPG: 279.4
------------------

Hell this may be another blowout. :td:
 
The more I study this matchup the more confident I become. Everyone says how dominant VT's defense is but they are comparable to Clemson's.

Check these 2008 stats out.

Clemson Defense.

PPG: 17.3

RYPG: 127.4

PYPG: 172.5

TYPG: 299.9

--------------
Va Tech

PPG: 16.7

RYPG: 104.4

PYPG: 175.0

TYPG: 279.4
------------------

Hell this may be another blowout. :td:

Nice find!!!!
 
Back
Top Bottom