With the exception of our offensive line, I'm not worried about matching up against Georgia offensively. It's the other side of the ball I'm very concerned about. They're going to try and play bully ball, and every time a team does this, they've been successful against us in doing so.
Check their films.... They haven't exactly played well.
Itās only been three games. Statistically thereās not enough data.
What do you mean? O-line play? Running the ball? Because they physically imposed their will on Tennessee doing just that. They owned them up front.
Tough Room. What happened in the first three games last year and then next three games? The point of this is that while we will move up and down, but the number tends to tell a bit of what they're struggling with data wise and it correlates to the field performance.
Not the whole game. Tennessee Defense was gassed because they couldn't get off the field on 3rd down situations. They just was gassed.
They did the same exact thing in the first half to. Go back and rewatch it. And yeah, when you're getting your shit rocked up front, and the other team is able to run the ball consistently and keep drives going.... getting gassed is going to happen.
Not the full story for me. I go back to the pattern of CKD coached teams at Bama when they play good and even average teams on the road. It is ugly. Plus I see the LOS issues on both sides even against inferior opponents. Hope getting TK back makes all the difference on the DL and some magical way the OL performs to give us a running game. In the end the results I see determines my thoughts. CKD wants to change that then show the results on the field.
I think he is trying to make a statement and erase the past... No idea if true but it is possible. Smart came from the CNS culture that expects to dominate and make the opponent quit.
I think that beatdown of #10 Clemson in the ATL would like a word.
I heard mark Richt left that game with notes written all over his arms cause he went to see his son play and it turned into a scouting trip
Agreed, but that doesnāt mean the data is valid. 1. You have the quality of opponents over three games. 2. You have the strengths and weaknesses of each team during those three games. 3. You have the intangibles (weather, rosters (injuries, availability). Just because a stat is used doesnāt mean itās valid. Media is notorious for twisting stats to show trends that arenāt trends.
Factual representation, yes. Able to draw valid conclusions, no. Two legitimate D1 teams to their one tells you that the data is skewed.
Ya know, what's ironic here is the poll/ranking you're suggesting and what they should rely on ... that's eerily similar to the one that is criticized for '41.
