TideAlum05 Verified Member Member Nov 8, 2009 #21 of 25 The refs didn't give Bama the game at all. But that was a pick.
Big_Fan Verified Member Member Nov 8, 2009 #22 of 25 TideAlum05 said: The refs didn't give Bama the game at all. But that was a pick. Click to expand... The fact that it is arguable means that it was not indisputable. Therefore the ruling on the field could not be overturned.
TideAlum05 said: The refs didn't give Bama the game at all. But that was a pick. Click to expand... The fact that it is arguable means that it was not indisputable. Therefore the ruling on the field could not be overturned.
BamaPride Verified Member Member Nov 8, 2009 #23 of 25 I thought it was a pick at the time and still do. However, I don't think the replays showed enough to change the call on the field. 9-0 baby. Thats all that matters. :nana:
I thought it was a pick at the time and still do. However, I don't think the replays showed enough to change the call on the field. 9-0 baby. Thats all that matters. :nana:
tidentrue I'm Bonafied!! Member Nov 8, 2009 #24 of 25 I believe either way it was called on the field, (catch/no catch), it would have stood because of lack of video evidence either way
I believe either way it was called on the field, (catch/no catch), it would have stood because of lack of video evidence either way
Bamsambo Verified Member Member Nov 8, 2009 #25 of 25 Can you imagine the turmoil if Jones had taken his helmet off? :rofl: