🏈 Florida State to use independent arbiter to decide Winston code-of-conduct case

Florida State will change the normal procedure for student-code-of-conduct cases, using an independent arbiter to examine the rape accusation against Jameis Winston.

Florida State University officials late on Friday decided to bypass the normal process for conducting a student-code-of-conduct investigation in the case of Heisman Trophy winner Jameis Winston and will send the case to an independent arbiter.

The university, since at least early August, has been looking into a woman's allegation that she was raped by Winston on Dec. 7, 2012. Specifically, the school began the investigation in an effort to determine whether Winston violated the student conduct code.

Winston was not charged with a crime in the incident, which his attorneys have repeatedly said was nothing more than a consensual sexual encounter.

An attorney for the woman confirmed FSU's decision to use an arbiter.

Although the school's investigation cannot end in criminal charges, a finding that Winston violated university rules could have serious ramifications for him. If, for instance, the school were to find he committed sexual misconduct in the incident, he could face a sanction as severe as expulsion from Florida State.

Normally, the school would investigate and determine whether to charge a student with a violation of university rules. If that happened, then the case would go to a hearing, where university administrators would take testimony and consider evidence before determining whether a violation occurred.

If there was a finding that a student violated the code of conduct, the decision would then be made about punishment.

On Friday night, David Cornwell, an attorney who has advised Winston and his family, posted a message on Twitter: "FSU creates new procedures 2 investigate the false allegations. Declines to charge Jameis w/a violation of the Code of Student Conduct. [HASHTAG]#1step[/HASHTAG]".

John Clune, an attorney who represents the woman in the case, confirmed that he was notified by FSU administrators that the school was altering the normal process. Instead of looking at the evidence and making a decision about whether a charge is warranted, FSU is going to send the case straight to a neutral arbiter -- who hasn't yet been identified.

That person, most likely a retired judge, will go straight to a hearing, where he or she will consider testimony and other evidence and make a finding of fact. Both the woman and Winston will be invited to testify at the hearing.

If that arbiter concludes that Winston violated the code of conduct, then he would face penalties under Florida State policies.

It is not clear how soon that hearing will be held.

Cornwell could not be reached for comment Friday night.

Clune, however, said it was not accurate to say that Winston would not be charged -- the university's plan to send the case to an outside arbiter bypassed the part of the procedure where the decision on a charge against Winston would be made.

"We would not have commented publicly on this, but someone on Mr. Winston's behalf was already tweeting some pretty inaccurate information about the letter that was received," Clune said.


Continue reading...
 
Color me confused.

Because of Winston's position on the football team FSU has decided to treat him differently than other students in the code-of-conduct hearing.

Extra benefits are considered those an athlete receives that are above and beyond what another student, at the same University, would receive.

How is this not a violation of NCAA rules for them to handle Winston's case in this manner? Is this not preferential treatment, per sé?
 
It kinda sounds to me like FSU is trying to cover all the bases legally before they slam dunk his ass thru the goal posts of life. You got to admit Mr Winston has brought all kinds of embarrassing shame upon the FSU community.
 
NCAA had no legal basis to hammer PSU in their cover-up because it would be a huge stretch to say what PSU did gave them a competitive advantage on the field. Probably why the NCAA has now removed all of the restrictions.

There is no question whatsoever that FSU's cover-up gave them a competitive advantage on the field. Where the hell is the NCAA now?
 
Seems to be a case of FSU playing CYA after the fact that Shameous has repeatedly violated rule after rule since he stepped foot on that campus. They covered this mess up last season so it wouldn't interfere with their season and their shot at the Natty. I don't have the link but the New York Times uncovered a ton of incidents involving FSU football players being protected by the Tallahassee PD.
Now since UF suspended Harris on sexual assault allegations as soon as word broke, FSU is put in the spotlight as to how bad they screwed that up with Winston. I know Harris has since been reinstated and no charges filed, but the shots have been fired by UF.
Extra benefits? If there was a picture for extra benefits in Webster's, there would be multiple pics showing everything that FSU has done to keep the asshat Winston in school.
 
Color me confused.

Because of Winston's position on the football team FSU has decided to treat him differently than other students in the code-of-conduct hearing.

Extra benefits are considered those an athlete receives that are above and beyond what another student, at the same University, would receive.

How is this not a violation of NCAA rules for them to handle Winston's case in this manner? Is this not preferential treatment, per sé?

When has the NCAA ever acted appropriately?
 
Actually,, the school's decision to use an independent arbiter seems sound to me. If they followed the usual procedures and found that no violations occurred, the cries of cover up would continue. This way they are in the clear if the arbiter says no violations, and can go forward with whatever discipline is called for if the arbiter does find violations. As was said above, it is CYA time.
 
Back
Top Bottom