You may be right in saying he didn't rape her. I do find your reasoning suspect.Winston did not rape her. When I read the entire police report and follow up information a while back, it became clear that to me that he was innocent. And to the judicial system as well.
Like I said, she has a case against the university and the way it was all handled.... But she has no case against Winston.
ā¢You read the entire police report and based on what you read you've come to the conclusion he's innocent.
ā¢She has a case against the University because of the way it was handled.
The way it was handled, like the main detective admitting he made "missteps" in the investigation, makes the police report published questionable, at best. The University's handling of this, sending the reports to the Athletic Department and Winston's attorney's before the the judicial system, was wrong and it's the reason this is settled. When the evidence was getting to be overwhelming this investigation had been botched, you see FSU and their attorney's settling. Why?
It seems to me if you make a judgement based on something that was flawed originally, the chances of your judgement being flawed are fairly high. The chain of evidence thing...there's no telling what's the story in the end.
