🏈 Can Alabama Run the Table After Beating Missouri? | Inside College Football

Same here. Probably will have one more loss but not sure who it will be.
Seems like something to say...and i don't disagreed...but seems like something....
Thats a trend more than a fact...and a judgement based on schedule...performance...n...likelihood in numbers...

But...this team under TY....is getting it done...

O boy..i think we are about to find out a lot this Saturday night
 
I gotta point out a few things I don't like first off...these guys aren't very informed. They think we're on a bye week this week.

They talk all about how Missouri could've done better and likely won if they commit 0 turnovers. I counter that with we commit 0 turnovers we win by more easily.

Also, directly 3 more turnovers missed in the first half...I mean if Bama picks up 1-2 of those first half turnovers it might have been a blowout.
 
I gotta point out a few things I don't like first off...these guys aren't very informed. They think we're on a bye week this week.

They talk all about how Missouri could've done better and likely won if they commit 0 turnovers. I counter that with we commit 0 turnovers we win by more easily.

Also, directly 3 more turnovers missed in the first half...I mean if Bama picks up 1-2 of those first half turnovers it might have been a blowout.
Largely decides game. Teams make those -5-8 plays. We didn't make em all. What 50-50.
But we made stop on fake punt. Great throw n catch. Int ( when the a receiver wide open).

Thats why game was close.

Need to be makjng 80% Especially vs tn
So. TN. LSU. oK And @ USCe. N @ AU.

What a schedule to go through
And ohio state Has @whiconsin. Psu. Ucla. @Purdue. Rutgers. @ Michigan.

What a difference
 
Last edited:
Also, directly 3 more turnovers missed in the first half...I mean if Bama picks up 1-2 of those first half turnovers it might have been a blowout.
I think you're right. We get up by 14-17 and come out in the second half and don't give them a short field, it would have gotten ugly. They would have had to get out of their game plan and throwing is not their cup of tea. They had a couple of decent throw and catches late, but it ultimately bit them with the INT to seal it for us. I think if were would have been able to come out in the second half and put pressure on them by scoring.....they would have had to abandon what they wanted to do, more so than what we forced.
 
I think you're right. We get up by 14-17 and come out in the second half and don't give them a short field, it would have gotten ugly. They would have had to get out of their game plan and throwing is not their cup of tea. They had a couple of decent throw and catches late, but it ultimately bit them with the INT to seal it for us. I think if were would have been able to come out in the second half and put pressure on them by scoring.....they would have had to abandon what they wanted to do, more so than what we forced.
Points left on the board. It's one of the biggest reasons I look at efficiency numbers.
 
One at a time…..but have you seen the boogs play defense? Their defense and playing in their sandbox will be a very difficult game. We will have to play close to perfect to beat them down there. Last 2 trips there were miraculous for us to win.
 
Back
Top Bottom