@50+yeartidefan the "little stuff" comment. It's just not a fair comment in my view.
I don't see these two comments as being fair either. Mentioning USC as an indictment on Lane is questionable. A .650 win percentage at a school in the middle of being slammed by the NCAA isn't a black mark on a resume. The way he ran the program was an example of the job being too big for him. I still see the same issues with him now at Ole Miss as I saw years ago; an inability to maintain focus. And UT...had the best results there in 15 years, yeah? That 2009 team was competitive and that's not something we can say about a lot of UT teams lately.
But I will say this. Given time, he has the ability to leave a John Vaught mark in the history at Ole Miss. If he stays. And, I believe he's smart enough to realize the job in Oxford is a better fit for him now than one in West Opelika.