bradenob
Member
This review didn't treat us kindly - I was a bit shocked.
College football's best (and worst) NFL factories
Of course, some of the stats were done oddly - how are we not one of the teams on the rise over the past several years, but Notre Dame, and Clemson, are? They based that on 'Running Total Draft Value'?
We didn't show up under 'All-Pro' but finished 8th of 10 on Pro-bowlers - behind ole piss, UCF, Cincinatti and PURDUE???? Of course, it's based on % of picks out of the total picks (minimum 20 - really, PURDUE???) that made Pro-bowl.
Under 'Long Term Starters' we're 9th - and that's ok, but LSU, GA, and UF, as well as Cal, are all ahead of us. We don't make it if you adjust for 8 year starters....
Hey, it's Saban's 10th year, and Shula wasn't kind to us... but still a bit surprised - if we recheck in 3 years I am sure things would look different - will take a while to dethrone Miami using these stats.
College football's best (and worst) NFL factories
Of course, some of the stats were done oddly - how are we not one of the teams on the rise over the past several years, but Notre Dame, and Clemson, are? They based that on 'Running Total Draft Value'?
We didn't show up under 'All-Pro' but finished 8th of 10 on Pro-bowlers - behind ole piss, UCF, Cincinatti and PURDUE???? Of course, it's based on % of picks out of the total picks (minimum 20 - really, PURDUE???) that made Pro-bowl.
Under 'Long Term Starters' we're 9th - and that's ok, but LSU, GA, and UF, as well as Cal, are all ahead of us. We don't make it if you adjust for 8 year starters....
Hey, it's Saban's 10th year, and Shula wasn't kind to us... but still a bit surprised - if we recheck in 3 years I am sure things would look different - will take a while to dethrone Miami using these stats.
