t’s been nine days since Gus Malzahn was fired as Auburn’s head football coach. What has happened since could reverberate through the Auburn program for years to come. Almost from the start, this burgeoning controversy has seemed more personal than professional.
And that is a road to ruin.
Any administrator who is thinking in terms of doing anything for any reason other than what is best for Auburn football and the young men who play is not doing his or her job. What is best for Auburn football isn’t winning the press conference. It isn’t doing something for the purpose of saying “I told you so” or getting happy feedback on social media or making some administrator or trustee look good. It isn’t pointing fingers and assigning blame. There is plenty of blame to go around. It is making the best choice, whoever that is, for the right reasons and then doing whatever it takes to give that person every opportunity his rivals have.
Can all the factions, too often at odds with another, come together. The long-term health of Auburn football depends on it.
On Monday, a Sun Belt Conference coach passed on the job when he could have had it. A Conference USA coach passed on it with no offer. On Tuesday, Clemson defensive coordinator Brent Venables turned it down.
It all started on a December Sunday, a day after a 26-10 win at Mississippi State.
After the very difficult decision was made to fire Malzahn, Gogue was unhappy with some trustees for pushing him to immediately hire Steele. Angry words were exchanged. Athletics director Allen Greene was unhappy that he was left out of the decision to fire Malzahn, a move he strongly opposed. Trustees were unhappy that Gogue had insisted on waiting until the season was over and had then insisted on a committee.
An eight-person advisory committee was appointed last Tuesday, but seemingly three of those members – Greene, university COO Gen. Ron Burgess and trustee Quentin Riggins – are playing key roles and are doing all the interviews.
For days, all signs pointed to Steele being eventually named head coach, but then he was left out of the interviews. Louisiana coach Billy Napier jumped into the lead, and the job was his for the taking. He declined. UAB’s Bill Clark interviewed on Monday. He was not offered the job but pulled out anyway.
Lots of things have combined to make the Auburn program look less attractive to coaches than it has been in decades. Squabbling and power struggles among administrators, trustees and others is part of it. An explosion of venom and character attacks on social media is part of it. A president who is a short-timer and an athletics director who is known to have had a wandering eye is part of it. Being between Alabama to the west and Georgia to the east is part of it.
Auburn football has been pushed to the edge of the abyss.
It didn’t have to be this way and shouldn’t be this way. It’s not too late, but tTo avoid a meltdown of a proud and storied program, someone must step up, take control and stop the madness.
Otherwise, Auburn football could be facing some very dark times.