I don't know how many of you are aware of it, I've only casually been looking for the results, but the USA Today has had a review (3 months long) of how the coaches poll is conducted, ways to improve it, how accurate it is, etc.
While those results will be released during the meetings next week, it'll likely be a little longer before we see any of the findings considering the AFCA will consult with USA Today and the BCS officials before making these results public.
Personally, I think there is a lot of room for improvement in all of the polls. It seems logical to me that coaches from one conference should be restricted in some manner on how they vote for other teams in their conference. It also seems like the overall voters should require some sort of overhaul so there is an equal representation of teams/conferences.
Just arbitrarily, let's take Texas and see a little about how their votes went last season and keep in mind this is before they played Ohio State in the Bowl game.
Texas coach Mack Brown kept his Longhorns in second place in the last vote of the regular season for USA Today.
Brownās ballot ā 1. Florida; 2. Texas; 3. Oklahoma; 4. Alabama; 5. Penn State.
The Longhorns received four first-place votes. They were from North Texasā Todd Dodge, Iowa Stateās Gene Chizik, UCLAās Rick Neuheisel and Texas-El Pasoās Mike Price.
Dodge played for the Longhorns and Chizik was UTās defensive coordinator from 2005-06.
Texas was no lower than fifth on anyoneās ballot.
And hereās who voted Texas fifth ā Texas Techās Mike Leach, Baylorās Art Briles, Rutgersā Greg Schiano and Michigan Stateās Mark Dantonio.
Leach and Briles each voted the Sooners No. 1.
The Longhorns were second on 15 ballots, including those cast by Dick Tomey, Mike Bellotti, Turner Gill, Dan Hawkins, Gary Pinkel and Jim Tressel.
First of all, you have to ask yourself why on earth does Mike Price have a vote that impacts the the BCS games when his own conference isn't a part of the BCS conferences?
North Texas has a voter?
I consistantly see this time of year people using pre-season polls as the butt of their jokes. Hell, with the fodder provided by polls that count, why bother?
While those results will be released during the meetings next week, it'll likely be a little longer before we see any of the findings considering the AFCA will consult with USA Today and the BCS officials before making these results public.
Personally, I think there is a lot of room for improvement in all of the polls. It seems logical to me that coaches from one conference should be restricted in some manner on how they vote for other teams in their conference. It also seems like the overall voters should require some sort of overhaul so there is an equal representation of teams/conferences.
Just arbitrarily, let's take Texas and see a little about how their votes went last season and keep in mind this is before they played Ohio State in the Bowl game.
Texas coach Mack Brown kept his Longhorns in second place in the last vote of the regular season for USA Today.
Brownās ballot ā 1. Florida; 2. Texas; 3. Oklahoma; 4. Alabama; 5. Penn State.
The Longhorns received four first-place votes. They were from North Texasā Todd Dodge, Iowa Stateās Gene Chizik, UCLAās Rick Neuheisel and Texas-El Pasoās Mike Price.
Dodge played for the Longhorns and Chizik was UTās defensive coordinator from 2005-06.
Texas was no lower than fifth on anyoneās ballot.
And hereās who voted Texas fifth ā Texas Techās Mike Leach, Baylorās Art Briles, Rutgersā Greg Schiano and Michigan Stateās Mark Dantonio.
Leach and Briles each voted the Sooners No. 1.
The Longhorns were second on 15 ballots, including those cast by Dick Tomey, Mike Bellotti, Turner Gill, Dan Hawkins, Gary Pinkel and Jim Tressel.
First of all, you have to ask yourself why on earth does Mike Price have a vote that impacts the the BCS games when his own conference isn't a part of the BCS conferences?
North Texas has a voter?
I consistantly see this time of year people using pre-season polls as the butt of their jokes. Hell, with the fodder provided by polls that count, why bother?