what distinguishes them ....as the mighty of the mighty tigers...is the last 10 years of consistencies.... back to back 10 + win seasons...
... Dont think AU has had such even once in a while...
Clemson with the exception of the last 8-10 years is the same as the Barner program. Not a traditional power program in my view. Decent to good at times (when they throw money around) but all over the map otherwise.
Arkansas and LSU. He tore Vandy a new one last season; three incompletions, six touchdowns as I recall. He finished the season a little better than 2:1 (TD to INT.)
That Arkansas then Auburn run was weird last season. Lane's play calling was a lot of dink and dunk. LSU comes around to close the season and he's testing their DB's: a talented group who under performed last season. It's my opinion he'll be a top three conference guy this season in yards and TD's.
They were on the national stage last year in the regular season against Ohio State and got beat! It was getting out of hand until a late push by Indiana. Life doesn't care about what your enjoyment may be, so why should a system like college football? The nanny state, man. This is no different than everyone getting a trophy. If Indiana wants to be overjoyed, do what it takes to win your conference. Got news for you, if you can't beat most of your schedule and win your conference...you most likely aren't good enough to win the Natty or be a part of it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.